I totally agree. People are more likely to pay to read the news they are biased to. So all forms of media have a high incentive to bias their content towards their consumer's point of view.
Given the human bias for sources that confirm rather than challenge preconceived notions, I'd imagine that market segment is quite small. Even among people that say they want such a service!
And on top of that, there's a difference between news and data. "xx people were run over by a truck in an attack group Y has claimed responsibility for" is a (poor) headline, not an article. Once you expand out beyond a reading of simple facts, bias creeps in everywhere from choice of sources to choice of words to quantity of coverage.
Worse, simple facts are rarely interesting or actionable. People want analysis.
