Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Would it make more sense to distribute electron as a dependency and allow apps to use it? That way, instead of 10 apps requiring 10 different electrons we have 10 apps that can use a pre-installed electron.


No, because history has shown that shared libraries on any and all platforms inevitably become bundled into applications themselves (leaving one wondering WhyTF someone would choose something as unnecessarily complex as Docker over, you know, static linking).

Those who do not know history are doomed to reinvent it, poorly. Or something like that.


How does an app bundling Electron in that way differ from an app using a native embedded browser widget (other than that it can run in Chrome vs. Edge/Safari/etc.)?


> using a native embedded browser widget (other than that it can run in Chrome vs. Edge/Safari/etc.)?

I didn't know that was possible, do people do that?



Isn't that what Chrome/FF/Safari/Edge/IE/... all do?




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: