> The Web is the best example I can think of for why we still need net neutrality.
I think the Web is best example of why we need privacy protection as it is a form of communication.
I personally pay for a VPN. And I hope my right to use independently implemented (independent from Google/Facebook/ISPs) privacy preservation technology and de-anonymization-resistant technology is not lost, and instead encouraged by the legal system.
In my view, the so called 'net neutrality' is simply a deceiving name for 'a subjective favoritism' given away (as political/economic favors) to some web-monetization players vs others.
Eg. ISPs cannot favor/unfavor content providers, but yet Search engine company can favor/unfavor/rank content providers.
So ISPs are labeled as 'evil' while search and social networking service providers are the 'good doers'.
> The Web is the best example I can think of for why we still need net neutrality.
I think the Web is best example of why we need privacy protection as it is a form of communication.
I personally pay for a VPN. And I hope my right to use independently implemented (independent from Google/Facebook/ISPs) privacy preservation technology and de-anonymization-resistant technology is not lost, and instead encouraged by the legal system.
In my view, the so called 'net neutrality' is simply a deceiving name for 'a subjective favoritism' given away (as political/economic favors) to some web-monetization players vs others.
Eg. ISPs cannot favor/unfavor content providers, but yet Search engine company can favor/unfavor/rank content providers.
So ISPs are labeled as 'evil' while search and social networking service providers are the 'good doers'.