Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People who just want funding don't work on things like the LHC. If you want to solve a problem while someone is throwing money at you, then you work in defense. You shouldn't be so quick to harshly judge people who are making the choice to explore the edges of what we can achieve rather than make a quick buck developing the best new way to kill someone.


right right. i am just totally making up this thing where research and results are forged, driven by state grants.


Yes you are. Do you really think no one would have noticed if the Standard Model was - as you call it - a forgery?


http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientists-repl... http://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-f... http://www.nature.com/news/science-journalism-can-be-evidenc...

40,000 scientific papers invalidated. - https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/03/14/scandal-mri-br...

http://nautil.us/blog/we-should-not-accept-scientific-result...

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-re...

https://explorable.com/research-grant-funding - "Let's start by saying money does matter. It matters in every sector including science. Even if the researcher has a pure love of the scientific method, given the right circumstances, such as pride or the right amount of money, there may be some consideration given to skewing the data or holding back on publishing results for a little longer than they should."

http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-t...

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/scientific-r...


I hope you do not need to have the difference between psychology and physics explained to you.

Also, does any of this refer to the Standard Model specifically?


Thank God that never happens in the free market. /s


not helping the argument




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: