Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

re: "ls -l" understood. I ran "ls -ld ."



Ah, I'm not familiar with dtrace so I guess I missed that in your comment. Thanks for the clarification.


Understandable. The dtrace command you see is tracing a process "ls" (regardless of switches). I didn't show my work (ls -ld .) that generated the output, so your confusion isn't unfounded. :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: