Nope, neuromorphic means the hardware would simulate the neurobiology, not ANNs. More practically, they would never publish in Science if their title was "printing ANNs in hardware".
TrueNorth hardware, as I illustrated, does not resemble neurobiology at all. There are no brain-like components there, on any level. Moreover, it can run ANN algorithms just as easily as more "neuromorphic" algorithms.
Pointing to how they chose to name it for publication is not exactly a very convincing argument to support your view, is it? :)
My point is architectures like TrueNorth are very impressive from the point of view of a computer engineer, and they are very efficient when running their intended applications (neural network algorithms). The fact that they are not "brain-like" does not make them any less impressive.
