Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

particularly when a lot of the research was achieved by charity funding and tax grants. public funded then privately profited is a disgusting outcome of our current research system.



I would disagree. Securing a patent means that further investment is possible.

Yes, one of the two labs discovered CRISPR. OK, now what? It's not a treatment at this point, it's just a technique. So someone has to invest a ton of money to turn the technique into a therapy for humans. And I would bet that investment will absolutely dwarf what's been spent so far.


This means that only one line of further development will be possible, since a patent is basically a license for a monopoly.

Instead, we could grant subsidies and have multiple developments working in parallel.


Depending on what the other uses are, the patent holder is always able to out-license the patent for specific uses. This is actually pretty common in biotech.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: