"Rosling’s first discovery was that many people are not aware of even the most basic facts about global health and global development. Through surveys he conducted, Rosling found that at a time when poverty is falling faster than ever before, the majority of people think that the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty is rising."
-- I suspect most people tend to extrapolate their experiences and their unhappiness to the globe, plus photos of impoverished Africans have been a media/charity staple for years.
But really, there are two things happening. More and more people are joining the money economy and so the people living on "pennies a day" are decreasing. But oppositely, wealth inequality is vastly increasing and often standards of living are decreasing for those in the money economy (who will never go back to living on pennies a day but can still have a terrible standard of living).
As Chico Marx said, "who ya' gonna believe, me or your own eyes".
As a counter-point to the "we gotta educate people 'bout how what they think is misery is really great" types of attitudes, I'd suggest this article from an OECD economist Gabriela Ramos, who seems to finally notice that just "education on statistics" isn't going to do it.
'We are witnessing, in the words of the World Bank’s Branko Milanovic, “the first decline in global inequality between world citizens since the Industrial Revolution.”'
It's also a side effect of globalization. As trade barriers come down, the well off from the richest parts of the world will become much more well off. The poor from the richest parts of the world will see their quality of life decline. The rich from the poorest parts of the world will see their power wane and the poor from the poorest parts of the world will see massive increases in quality of life.
Is wealth inequality really that important? I don't feel much pressure to "keep up with the Joneses". I'd be much happier being twice as rich even if the people at the top were 4 times as rich.
It depends on what you want in life. There can not be 7 billion mansions on the waterfront land of the equator. Only one person can own the Yankees. These things are decided by wealth inequality regardless of how rich we all become. If you just want a roof over your head somewhere and food to eat, then yeah it doesn't matter at all.
His daughter posted a great short article about him on Gapminder's Facebook page prefacing with a few words of her own. I will copy here her words and the article.
"Hans would have loved reading this article after his death!
Thousands and thousands of wonderful words have been written about my father during the last days. I knew he was popular. But I didn’t expect this avalanche of comforting condolences. Thanks a million everyone!
All the stories have been wonderful, but last night one article made my jaw drop. While scrolling down the page I kept thinking: Hans would have loved reading this after his death!
The article was called “This is how we let Hans Rosling rest in peace”. It was written in Swedish, by someone I’d never heard of. How could this person know my father so well? Was he a close friend of Hans, whom I had never met? How could he express with such precision what my father was thinking and feeling?
After I woke up this morning I couldn’t resist calling the author, Peter Fällmar Andersson, who answered with a humble voice. He told me he had interviewed Hans only ones. Hans had mainly used the time to explain why he refused being categorised as an optimist. In addition to that, Peter only had access to the same free online material as everyone else.
Peter, you must be a very good listener! Many people didn’t hear what Hans was saying. And you must be a very good writer. Hans never managed to express his frustration as clearly as you do. The frustration of being fame, but not being listened to. And then you convey what Hans wanted everyone to hear!
Most people can not read our tribal language (as Hans usually called Swedish). So I asked Peter to translate the article.
Please read carefully.
Thanks Peter Ola Rosling"
"Peter Fällmar Andersson: This is how we let Hans Rosling rest in peace
Hans Rosling was said to be unable to deliver bad news.
That is a misconception.
Three years before passing away, he remarked that the one thing that had surprised him the most during his tenure as a global educator was that he became so famous – despite having so little influence over people’s real knowledge. He realized he was stuck in ”persona hell”, and that people remained ignorant at a level worse than random guessing when they took Gapminder’s tests. Not because of a lack of knowledge, but because of ”an actively upheld ignorance”.
He had discovered that people actively had set their minds to remaining ignorant.
Hans Rosling had devoted decades to try to throw out our Tintin-like perspective, but kept on having to say ”wrong, wrong, wrong” when the Swedish people answered the question of how many children are born per woman in Bangladesh.
So how do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By forgetting that he sometimes swallowed swords in a heavy metal style tank top.
And by remembering that mothers in Bangladesh no longer give birth to five children on average, nor four, but TWO POINT TWO children.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By forgetting that he got more clicks than Lady Gaga online.
And by remembering that 80 percent of the children of the world now have access to the most important and most cost efficient of all vaccines: the one for measles.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By forgetting that Time Magazine put him on some list.
And by remembering that Hans Rosling was certain that the world, if it got it’s act together, can reach the goal that the United Nations set for the year 2030: to exterminate extreme poverty for everyone, everywhere.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By forgetting that he was a ”data rock star” at the lecture network website Ted.
And by remembering that life expectancy globally has skyrocketed, and now averages 72 years.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By forgetting false quotes, distributed by people who want everything for the world but Rosling’s humanism.
And by remembering that he spoke of the refugees on the Mediterranean by saying: ”Send a ferry to help them over, instead of saving them when they are about to drown”.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By forgetting that he once competed in ”På spåret”, one of Sweden’s oldest and most popular game shows.
And by remembering that Hans Rosling, the man, was a result of a political struggle that created a nation built on social security, that made it possible for him – who grew up in a home without a flushable toilet – to be the first in his family to study at a higher level. His dad worked in a coffee factory, his mother as an assistant at a library. And that he, thanks to that same nation state, was able to receive his first cancer treatment as a father of small children, at age 30. And that the treatment gave him another 38 years to live.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
By – hesitantly – forgetting that he once turned some colleagues down when they wanted him to take part in a student comic theater celebration: ”got no time. gotta stop ebola. get something online.”
And by remembering that Hans Rosling sometimes was mistaken, or drew the wrong conclusions.
How do we let Hans Rosling rest in peace?
Perhaps by following his example, and whisper a quick ”thank you” when turning on the water faucet, to get clean, fresh, healthy water.
In the spirit and hope of his heavenly harmony, may we finally understand what his Lego blocks, his graphical bubbles and Swenglish accent were all about:
-- I suspect most people tend to extrapolate their experiences and their unhappiness to the globe, plus photos of impoverished Africans have been a media/charity staple for years.
But really, there are two things happening. More and more people are joining the money economy and so the people living on "pennies a day" are decreasing. But oppositely, wealth inequality is vastly increasing and often standards of living are decreasing for those in the money economy (who will never go back to living on pennies a day but can still have a terrible standard of living).
As Chico Marx said, "who ya' gonna believe, me or your own eyes".
As a counter-point to the "we gotta educate people 'bout how what they think is misery is really great" types of attitudes, I'd suggest this article from an OECD economist Gabriela Ramos, who seems to finally notice that just "education on statistics" isn't going to do it.
http://oecdinsights.org/2017/02/01/telling-the-whole-truth-i...