> considering salary as preposterously simple function of labor supply with no other parameters.
Or it's not a complete model of the many possible parameters relevant in the economy. "preposterously simple" needs qualification on why it is ""preposterous" given IT IS NOT A COMPLETE ECONOMIC MODEL.
> It doesn't "demonstrate" ANY exact relationship
It demonstrates the rate of salary proportional to some function of the difference in supply and demand. If there are multiple factors involved in determining a value, I can still represent the nature of the relationship a single factor has with that value. It's "that-exact relationship", not "that exact-relationship".
I won't be told, because you're wrong. I don't "feel" badgered, I am badgered.
Or it's not a complete model of the many possible parameters relevant in the economy. "preposterously simple" needs qualification on why it is ""preposterous" given IT IS NOT A COMPLETE ECONOMIC MODEL.
> It doesn't "demonstrate" ANY exact relationship
It demonstrates the rate of salary proportional to some function of the difference in supply and demand. If there are multiple factors involved in determining a value, I can still represent the nature of the relationship a single factor has with that value. It's "that-exact relationship", not "that exact-relationship".
I won't be told, because you're wrong. I don't "feel" badgered, I am badgered.