Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Is there any way to know that an expensive CO detector like this is worth getting for home use, instead of one costing 10x less?



Hard to say, but Omega definitely care enough about their brand and reputation to have a good QA system and testing of products in place. Since testing that a CO monitor is working is very hard for a consumer, you rely a lot on trust in the brand.

If you can get a good, trusted brand for home CO monitors, I'd say go for it.

Apparently, Kidde is a trusted brand in fire alarms etc. in the US, so I think this one ($20) is probably equally trustworthy:

https://www.amazon.com/Kidde-Battery-Operated-Carbon-Monoxid...


Anecdotal: I've bought cheap versions of things online enough times that I don't want to do it again (just got home from helping a friend install a battery that didn't even fit properly). I've had a few things melt and a couple explode..

I shudder to think that you would risk your life on a device of questionable quality.


>I shudder to think that you would risk your life on a device of questionable quality. //

The problem is surely knowing whether the expensive equivalent is just the same internals in a different retail pack (with other 'quality' signalling). That's genuinely hard for something that needs a lab to be tested.


A CO "monitor" is permitted to alert at low levels of CO (10-20 ppm). A UL-listed code compliant CO alarm may not. I personally think this is silly.

There are a few companies that sell low level CO monitors for residential use. They're all somewhat pricey.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: