Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is just semantics. You think that this does not constitute purchasing.

The company can just make it clear that they are not selling the product.




If they were to start doing that, we could debate those merits. However, Lexmark offered their products for sale, not rent, and they're claiming in court that some unexpected technicality makes it OK.

Commerce would grind to a halt if you had to retain a lawyer every time you wanted to buy something off the shelf from Target.


Yes, I agree.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: