Could you please explain yourself more? I tried to address these points earlier but I must have done a bad job at communicating, I apologize. Here:
(A) There is a 2 minute summary at the bottom of the page, with the pro/cons/dangers of benchmarking. But that doesn't mean benchmarking should be ignored, it is a legitimate science.
(B) My previous comment's (2) addressed the apples/orange, it would be nice if you could explain why it is handwaving when I tried preempt that directly (to which you ignored?).
(C) There is a fair question in my previous comment's (1), which you also didn't address - would you mind answering it?
I love having conversations with people. It would be easier for me to understand what you are trying to say, though, without being accused (ad-hominem) of being handwaving. Thanks, I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
(A) There is a 2 minute summary at the bottom of the page, with the pro/cons/dangers of benchmarking. But that doesn't mean benchmarking should be ignored, it is a legitimate science.
(B) My previous comment's (2) addressed the apples/orange, it would be nice if you could explain why it is handwaving when I tried preempt that directly (to which you ignored?).
(C) There is a fair question in my previous comment's (1), which you also didn't address - would you mind answering it?
I love having conversations with people. It would be easier for me to understand what you are trying to say, though, without being accused (ad-hominem) of being handwaving. Thanks, I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
Cheers!