Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Strongly disagree. People learned to program on the ZX81 because it was cool but essentially useless. It booted directly into a BASIC prompt and came with a fairly good introductory programming manual. The Spectrum was essentially a games console that a handful of nerds learned to program on.

Micro:bit is designed like the ZX81, using lessons learned from the Raspberry Pi. It's a useless toy, but it's a useless toy that is fantastically easy to program. Hook it up to a computer via USB, go to a URL and it Just Works. Type some code or drag some visual programming blocks, click "compile" and the program is running on your micro:bit. If you want to hook up a buzzer or a switch, you can do it with crocodile clips and one line of code. It's an incredibly slick onboarding process that is perfectly suited to education.

http://microbit.org/start/

With a device like the Arduboy, it's too tempting to just play games. To program it you need to download the Arduino IDE, then install a bunch of libraries, then fiddle about with settings, then start reading through a bunch of documentation. With micro:bit you can go from unboxing to hello world in about five minutes, even if you've never written a line of code in your life.




The ZX81 had a display. It makes all the difference.


No it didn't, it had a video out socket.

Micro:bit has a display, 2 buttons, tilt and magnet sensors, and a battery socket for power.

Surely it's like the Acorn BBC, loads of I/O, well designed software, and people complain it's more expensive than existing systems.


> Micro:bit has a display,

On

> http://microbit.org/about/

I only see 25 programmable LEDs, but no display.


I see a 5x5 display ;-)




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: