What I'd like to understand is: why did he publish the previous post? I mean, it was an opinion and he knew it's one that many don't agree with. If other people calling him out and disagreeing is a problem, then what was his original intention?
You can't publish your writing with things like "I don’t worry about the vindictive assholes out there who feel any questioning of their tribal beliefs is an affront to their person." and expect that nobody will point out it looks like you just took questioning of your beliefs as an affront to your person. Maybe I'm missing what he tried to achieve...
You can't publish your writing with things like "I don’t worry about the vindictive assholes out there who feel any questioning of their tribal beliefs is an affront to their person." and expect that nobody will point out it looks like you just took questioning of your beliefs as an affront to your person. Maybe I'm missing what he tried to achieve...