Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's true, but I wonder if computers will exceed out technical accuracy first, or begin to actually "understand" things first? I suspect the former.



They don't need to actually understand - whatever that means - they can apply statistical models based on phonetic distances and large corpora of dialogue.


Has that worked so far?


Google voice search will make several guesses as to what I said. It will sometimes enter a nonsensical, but similar sounding phrase to what I intended into the text box, but will then figure out that it's first guess is nonsense and return the correct search result.

So just based on observation I would say it works pretty good. On mobile I almost always use voice search, and unless I'm searching for an italian name or something weird it almost always hears me correctly. Even in a noisy pub.


That's a good point, I've rarely had issues with Google voice searching.


Of course it has. We went down from 40% to 6.9% error rate in 26 years. It may take a couple of decades to get to 0.1%.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: