If you are really adding some actual value then $5 is a price point that would make me dismiss your product offhand because the price is too low. Is there a gap in perception of value or is there just little value in what you are providing?

Yea I agree with this point. $5 is almost never a good price point for a product that is supposed to increase the value of a business (GA).

If you are really only worth $5 of value, then you are probably not worth the business' time to implement. Try to make your product worth >$50/month.

I would evaluate a Trial. "More intelligent report" is vague.

Thank you for your response. I will share with you. development is undergo.

No. I might like to pay for intelligence on GA if I knew anything about what was being offered. If you want more accurate answers, you're going to need to share more details.

I would pay >$100/mo for something that has intelligence. If you could create an AI to replace a junior marketing analyst, it's worth it. But you have to first talk with businesses and really understand what kind of intelligence they need.

No, GA provides a variety of reporting options and formats - from simple to complex - out of the box, it has an active expert community, and its best practices are very well-documented.

No

Thank you for your response. I would like to know the reason. Are there specific things that preventing you to invest when it's ROI is good. It will help me to make things that can be more usable.

I don't believe the ROI will be good; that is what you need to demonstrate to me

Most tools that pitch themselves like you are not a good fit for me

People don't need a reason to not do something.

They'd need a reason to do it. So clearly the pitch above failed to give them a reason.