'artificial intelligence' seems a reasonable descriptive term for such things to me. I don't think it's inaccurate.
It's artificial, so it doesn't have to work in the same way as human intelligence, and it doesn't carry any inherent claim about the level of intelligence, so ought to be able to cover stuff that's no way near the power of the best of human intelligence.
It's artificial, so it doesn't have to work in the same way as human intelligence, and it doesn't carry any inherent claim about the level of intelligence, so ought to be able to cover stuff that's no way near the power of the best of human intelligence.