Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I agree; but I think I'm still allowed to be disappointed that my use cases aren't a good fit for so thoroughly-heralded a language. :)



Don't be disappointed. If you don't need the performance Rust offers, then use another ML-ish language. More expressiveness, none of the ownership issues (just GC).


Which would you recommend for someone who prefers a C-like syntax, a good concurrency story, a comprehensive standard library, Java-esque speed, and dead-simple tooling (e.g., Go's tooling), and compilation to a static binary?


C# and F# can both compile to a static binary (Mono's AOT compiler), and meet your other requirements. I find it curious that "safety" wasn't one of the points.

If you're looking for C-like though, you are probably not in any modern-featured language designer's aim.


> I find it curious that "safety" wasn't one of the points

It was implied by the context of "ML" languages. That was my intention at least; I thought ML languages were characteristically safe.

Regarding "C-like", I mostly mean syntax. I'm not too familiar with the ML family, but many FP languages have bizarre syntax which amplifies the difficulty of learning new concepts IMO.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: