Actually, this report should be celebrated but for the completely different reasons that this wannabe boy king could be the last in House of Saud to rule the bulk of the Arabian Peninsula.
Usually when an inexperienced, reckless and spoiled brat succeeds in a corrupt and undemocratic political system, it's likely the final chapter of that system because the new power holder/grabber would wreck the house beyond repair thinking that he's instituting reforms when he's really undoing all the hard work done by his tyrannical but savvy predecessors to keep things together.
Kudos to Mohammad Salman and I wish him all luck in his endeavor and that he outperforms the likes of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi or King Farook of Egypt in destroying monarchy in their respective lands.
Also, it's very intriguing that there was not a single political item on his "reformist" agenda and yet Bloomberg managed to portray him as some kind of a visionary man that will emancipate women by finally granting them the right to own and drive cars as in other neighboring reactionary countries like Qatar, and restructuring the economy away from fluctuating oil revenues to another rent-seeking investment banking venture to finance the lavish lifestyle of their family, House of Saud.
I guess those IB fees and pending privatization deals do make wonders to Bloomberg's editorial policy. Money talks, bullshit walks indeed.
It's difficult to see it that way because being young or old is not really the criteria for the Saudi leaders. It's the opposite for this man, because the education is the biggest factor. The previous king hasn't even completed high school, and he was just... way too simple and knew nothing about politics. This guy got a bachelor's degree in politics and he's already received super positively in Saudi Arabia from both the religious and non-religious, especially because they have already seen a lot of positive changes done by him in the past few years.
> it's likely the final chapter of that system because the new power holder/grabber would wreck the house beyond repair thinking that he's instituting reforms when he's really undoing all the hard work done by his tyrannical but savvy predecessors to keep things together.
This. For example, every post-Stalin U.S.S.R leader. The watering down started with Kruschev [1] and culminated in Glasnost. What followed was the period of humiliation, poverty and looting at "the end of history" ie the 90's.
This is key to understanding the popularity of Putin.
Usually when an inexperienced, reckless and spoiled brat succeeds in a corrupt and undemocratic political system, it's likely the final chapter of that system because the new power holder/grabber would wreck the house beyond repair thinking that he's instituting reforms when he's really undoing all the hard work done by his tyrannical but savvy predecessors to keep things together.
Kudos to Mohammad Salman and I wish him all luck in his endeavor and that he outperforms the likes of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi or King Farook of Egypt in destroying monarchy in their respective lands.
Also, it's very intriguing that there was not a single political item on his "reformist" agenda and yet Bloomberg managed to portray him as some kind of a visionary man that will emancipate women by finally granting them the right to own and drive cars as in other neighboring reactionary countries like Qatar, and restructuring the economy away from fluctuating oil revenues to another rent-seeking investment banking venture to finance the lavish lifestyle of their family, House of Saud.
I guess those IB fees and pending privatization deals do make wonders to Bloomberg's editorial policy. Money talks, bullshit walks indeed.