Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you're missing my point here.

Some people trot the argument that it's OK for the government to compel apple to deliver the backdoored firmware because the measures it would circumvent are not of cryptographic/information-theoretical nature.

Then one could expand that argument by saying that compelling physical reverse-engineering is also OK because the devices are not built to be physically impossible (read: laws of nature) to pry open.



The devices ARE built to be physically impossible to open without destroying their contents.


In security, impossible usually means "there is no documented method yet".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: