Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Not accounting for inflation, it's not hard to believe:

    Median Home Values: Unadjusted

                     2000      1990      1980      1970     1960     1950    1940
 California        $211,500  $195,500   $84,500   $23,100  $15,100   $9,564  $3,527
The median alone is almost two orders of magnitude greater as of 2000, let alone 2016. I'm sure there is at least one bay-area home that has been untouched for 50 or 60 years that is now selling for well over a million.

From: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/valu...




You realize that somebody who bought in 1940 or earlier is over 100 years old now, right? (assuming becoming a homeowner at age 25). Not a significant demographic.

Beyond that, those numbers are fudged and do not reflect the changing value of the dollar. $3,537 in 1940 is $59,711 in 2015 dollars[0] (or $43,382 in 2000 dollars[0]), so your "two orders of magnitude" claim falls to a mere factor of less than 5 times, or < 5% of the "two orders of magnitude" claim.

And again, that isn't even a level comparison given that housing construction costs are far higher (well beyond the rate of inflation) due to more features, stricter building codes, modern appliances, permits, ...

[0] http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=3527&year1=1940...




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: