Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sorry, what does that ratio imply?


I'm assuming that the same rules apply as do in straight RF detection. A signal becomes a decent signal at 6db above noise and gets exponentially better every 6db above that. Something 20db above noise is rock solid reliable.


Uhh, 20db isn't the same as 20s/n ratio though?


SNR = 10log(Ps/Pw), solving

Ps/Pw = 10^(SNR/10) = 10^(20/10) == 100

A signal 20db above the noise, you could put your eye out with it.

db is confusing, when you're talking voltage it's 20log(Vs/Vw) And in absolute terms engineers talk about the power over 1mW.

Myself I get miffed a bit because people have been conditioned to think in terms of trying to pull facts out of crappy data sets using poorly thought out statistics. However in a lot of engineering and physics fields the data is often really good. Often good enough that you can work off a single measurement.


That one can be very confident the effect observed was real.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: