Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The second order problem is how to select which "experts" to believe. In my opinion, Hunsader sees conspiracies where none exist and interprets all unusual or hard-to-explain behavior as evidence for his existing beliefs. (Not to say he's never right, of course). But you have no reason to believe me, some random guy on the internet, and in general most experts on the subject are going to have some kind of conflict of interest.



I've gotten the same read about Hunsader and Nanex from other experts: good data, and interesting but questionable analysis.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: