Signez posted it before you did—note that the item ID is earlier. The timestamp is later because we re-upped the post; we try to privilege the first submitter when we do that. You can see the original timestamp on https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=Signez and most other pages that list a story. For a detailed description of all this, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10705926 and the links there.
Better duplicate management is something we're working on. Keep in mind, though, that HN doesn't consider a post a duplicate until the story has had significant discussion. Otherwise too many good stories would go unnoticed.
There were no constructive comments when I posted my message.
I was not sending anyone anywhere, I was notifying that there is a duplicate with the same URL. Personally, every time I submit a new recent story I make sure it hasn't been submitted before.
Anyways, I think this case with URLs not being completely the same but directing to the same page should be pointed out and discussed.
Actually, Hacker News sometimes invites submitters to resubmit a story that is highly relevant but didn't get traction. So, it's natural that resubmissions sometimes occur. (Although that's not the case here.)
I think it's indeed only worthwhile pointing to an existing thread if there is already a valuable discussion.
Comparing the value of "id", it would appear that your submission is the duplicate. Relax, though, I didn't downvote you for it -- just pointing that out.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10790734