> Saying that a parking ticket is "invalid" is a legal argument, and a company that makes legal arguments for people is a law firm. "Fixed" seems to be practicing law without a license.
I beg to differ. Your thinking is wrong IMO. Anyone can dispute a parking ticket and they don't need a law license to do that. What Fixed is doing is just doing it on their behalf. Let me ask you question, do you hire a lawyer to file a dispute for a $350 parking ticket?
Your question isn't particularly useful, some people might not hire a lawyer to fight against an accusation of murder, but it doesn't mean if you did hire someone to do it they wouldn't need to be qualified. Equally I'd be shocked if nobody had ever used a lawyer to contest a parking ticket.
>Your question isn't particularly useful, some people might not hire a lawyer to fight against an accusation of murder, but it doesn't mean if you did hire someone to do it they wouldn't need to be qualified.
You and I are thinking different things. A parking ticket and murder are 2 different things and should not be lumped together. Consider how much a lawyer charges an hour hence my question. If the parking tickets where $5,000 then my question wouldn't be useful. Why would I pay a lawyer $450 an hour to dispute a $350 charge?
Fixed does not need a legal license to dispute tickets on behalf of others.
I'm not saying you need to be a lawyer to do what Fixed is doing, just that the question of "would you hire a lawyer for X" isn't the way to argue that point. Because there are people who would get their lawyer to deal with it, and there are also people who would go into serious legal battles and defend themselves without hiring a lawyer.
I beg to differ. Your thinking is wrong IMO. Anyone can dispute a parking ticket and they don't need a law license to do that. What Fixed is doing is just doing it on their behalf. Let me ask you question, do you hire a lawyer to file a dispute for a $350 parking ticket?