Apples and oranges. Intel's mobile Skylake processors don't support more than 16GB of low-power RAM; Apple didn't have anything to do with that limitation.
I up voted your response as it's correct, but for anyone who doesn't want to believe, here's a fully referenced post I made a while back with specific references in the Intel documentation:
Now I know why both the new surface book and the mbook pro have such paltry ram configurations. Sad times when intel itself seems to be falling behind.
Intel's mobile processors like the ones in the Macbook Pro support up to 64 megs of ram. Their ultra low power cpus only support 16 gigs, but the line in question goes up to 64, even with ddr3l ram.
To me seems logical:
As we get older more and more energy would be used on preservation (read it as fix damage and less efficient process as result of age), therefore shrinking/eliminating everything not being used it's necessary.
Edit: TL;DR: From the PDF conslussions:
it is found that working hours up to 25–30
hours per week have a positive impact on cognition for males depending on the measure
and up to 22–27 hours for females. After that, working hours have a negative impact on
cognitive functioning.
Since the paper only looked at people above 40, I don't see how you can make any such conclusion. There is nothing about younger people. They may do better - they may also be the same or worse. They were not even included.
Nice catch, there are two parts in trying to support my theory, first included in my post:
As we get older more and more energy would be used on preservation (read it as fix damage and less efficient process as result of age), therefore shrinking/eliminating everything not being used it's necessary.
The second is an entry on how our bodies are machines oriented to try to avoid wasting energy... or better said preserving it... for that part my canonical reference would be the Algernon argument:
That is just your opinion - and it isn't even clear that it means anything. I don't see any supporting evidence. I'm not saying you are wrong (wrong with what, anyway? It's so vague and empty), I'm saying it's just some "statement", nothing more. Even so your list suffers from some severe selection bias: You chose exactly what supports your idea. What about greater "wisdom" of older people? Less desire to succeed at all cost, i.e. possibly more relaxed and willing to look at the big picture? Those two are just "statements", "ideas", so just like you :)
> The second is an entry on how our bodies are machines oriented to try to avoid wasting energy
Without even going into details about that sentence, that is a statement without a point. What exactly do you want to use it for? To show what? How?
The 1st part "our bodies are machines" is as trite a statement as it gets, pardon me for pointing this out.
The 2nd part "oriented to try to avoid wasting energy" is just as bad if not worse - if the main focus of our bodies was just that suicide and eternal sleep would be the best option to achieve that goal.
> As we get older more and more energy would be used on preservation...
> ...therefore shrinking/eliminating everything not being used it's necessary.
What is that even supposed to mean. Either part. Nor does it seem right (having taken medical courses such as physiology) - citation needed (after defining what you actually mean) for part 1, part 2 is completely unclear I'm sorry to say. What shrinks? What is eliminated?
> And he provided argumentation why this might be the case.
You are either a troll - and a bad one - or a troll. Posting a random link to something isn't "evidence". Not to mention that he didn't say anything, he just wrote "words". Impressive you are impressed.
> No, it's not his "opinion", it is his argument. And he provided argumentation
> why this might be the case.
So if I argue it's no longer subjective? I think you have the wrong idea about subjective/objective.
>Posting a random link to something isn't "evidence". Not to mention that he didn't say anything, he just wrote "words". Impressive you are impressed.
I didn't say that parent gave evidence. I say he gave an argument -- you know, premises and logical steps that can be followed (or refuted) to determine if something is true or not.
>So if I argue it's no longer subjective?
No, if someone puts forward an argument, it's by definition not subjective. An argument is something that can be evaluated.
Maybe you conflate arguments with opinions?
Of course an argument might be based on a subjective selection of premises, but that's beside the point. One can always refute the argument by pointing to issues in either its logic or its premises.
Another fab should mean options and with that price decrease.
I wonder how much a given chip price can be decreased with this move.
Another way of reading this is that making more use of a given tech should pay the initial cost faster thus making possible more research and improved processes.
Sadly another way of reading this is that Intel doesn't have any tech that would capitalize in better chips anymore.
Another good reason for dropping the M is in my opinion all related to how good another company got at creating gpus... that's Intel.
Intel first eliminated the whole aftermarket entry level gpu industry and will probably eliminate the middle tier also.
As Pluma states
"If you're going with a dedicated graphics card in your laptop, battery life is already out of the window, so you might as well get as much processing power as the thing can handle"
Yes, I gave a read to it but if I remember I think there was a piece that didn't perform up to the speed of the thunderbolt link making the whole solution run 1/4 speed.
The solution approach I think goes as back as when using the express card port on elitebooks
It would be incredible on the other hand to get this solutions as official products from vendors like nvidia or asus without the DIY (not because I'm against it but to push making use of this solutions officially will improve the state of the solutions).
And they still offer crappy 3D performance and for long time had better DirectX drivers than OpenGL ones, which sometimes lied about their actual hardware capabilities.
“&&=” and ”||=” operators
ES4 introduces assignment operators for the logical
“&&” and “||” operators. These assignment operators
are short-circuiting; if the value of the left-hand-
side determines the value of the result then the right-
handside is not evaluated.
This library can do Prolog-style solving of logical expressions. As in "here is a set of expressions, find me values for the variables that fulfill them." Completely different thing.
For example I've been a more active member on XDA for Cyanogen mod and I did a rude comment; I got my attention immediately called and the maintainer respond the question, same goes for HN.
OTOH... the Linux kernel group it's probably a "little bit" tougher....
[0] https://www.steamdeck.com/en/tech [1] https://www.steamdeck.com/en/tech/deck