Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wookayin's comments login

When simulation is CPU-heavy, it will never scale. Though I admit that event-based concurrency might work better in many cases (like where communication overhead is greater than computation), but in some environments you would need real parallelism using many CPU cores. This library also lacks benchmark.


You're right. I plan to add multiprocessing support such that there would be numCPU processes, each running one event loop. Which should scale properly.

What kinds of benchmark do you suggest? I'll do my best to provide one.

Thanks for the feedback.


tabnine-vim: YCM? Sorry to hear that...


Agreed. This was a deal breaker for me. It would be really great if it somehow implemented a standard protocol (like https://langserver.org/) in order to integrate with existing completion plugins.


I wrote an alternative vim plugin as a deoplete source: https://github.com/tbodt/deoplete-tabnine


This tool is also great: https://github.com/greymd/tmux-xpanes


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: