Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | vox's comments login

I'm assuming you've been downvoted because slightly more than 50% of HNers think of this project as an artistic/fun project.

But the fact is, even a purely artistic/fun project will have some creativity or originality in it. I would consider a toy language or Brainf__k written for the first time as artistic.

But this project is just a JIT for Brainf__k, there's no creativity in it, and all it did was give the author some experience writing JITs. In that sense this is an exercise project, and IMO exercise projects do not belong to HN.


exercise projects do not belong to [sic] HN

You've used HN for 38 days and you are already saying what kinds of programming articles should and shouldn't be on HN?

Sorry, but this is exactly the sort of thing we should see on HN.

But this project is just a JIT for Brainfuck, there's no creativity in it, and all it did was give the author some experience writing JITs.

How exactly do you define creative?

The author applied his programming skills to create something that didn't exist before. That's creative.


As someone interested in compiler technology, I was happy to see a simple example of a tracing JIT in LLVM. See: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3851


Does HN censor the "fuck" in "Brainfuck", or was it just you?

EDIT: Ah, it doesn't.


Generally, as long as it's part of something constructive and adds rather than detracts from the message, the community won't downvote profanity. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1636262



No there is not. From the page you link: "Conway and Kochen do not prove that free will does exist."


Everyone is unique, everyone is one in a million.


Why DDOS posterous? What's there to gain from it?

This isn't like the ones who DDOS'ed MS out of their hatred for it or the ones who blackmailed & DDOS'ed a gambling website when they refused to pay up.


I severely doubt this line of thought.. but they didn't make any friends with their "switch from X to us" campaign, and it only takes one bruised ego with a lack of ethics to stir up trouble.

That said, if it's like most other DDOS attacks I've seen reported, the target is probably a user of the service with Posterous merely being unlucky enough to host a particular site someone doesn't like. I vaguely recall another platform got DDOSed recently due to some Israel vs Iran type cyberwar.


Must be something that they really dislike.


Never underestimate the power of lulz when trying to understand a DDoS.


someone probably has an issue w/ the blog/content of someone who is using posterous rather than posterous themselves.


That's my guess as well.

Weebly said (I think in their YC Founders at Work interview) that they get multiple DDoSes a day, aimed not at them but at sites they host. Now they have good enough systems in place to deal with it that they said they often just don't notice.

I guess when you host enough people's content, it's only a matter of time before someone wants to DoS something you're hosting.


Maybe, and take it with a grain of salt, some people got infuriated by their recent switch to posterous campaign. I know this may be a very remote option, but in my opinion it's very possible.


"A grain of salt" is the expression.


Thank you


The botnet controller could be extorting websites directly... wire $5000 to my paypal account or your website will go down. Anyone from Posterous care to confirm/deny in this case?


This is very common with online gaming (== gambling) sites, and payment systems; anything where there is obviously money being processed.


Do you have any evidence that this has ever been done in the past?

It's not inconceivable, but it seems like a huge leap.


Google seems to provide plenty of examples. Even if it didn't, I don't understand why you see this extortion as a stretch.


It's not uncommon. There was an article a long time ago telling the story of a DDOS attack on a gambling website, and how a guy who was a philosophy major (iirc) figured out how to beat it, and then formed a company providing the same service. Forgot the url/title/etc, but it was good. Plenty more available with a search.


Could this have anything to do with Posterous' risqué post claiming superiority over Tumblr?

http://www.blogherald.com/2010/06/24/posterous-slanders-tumb...


Who knew what the attackers are thinking. Not too long ago DnsMadeEasy was DDoS from Korea.

Maybe there's financial incentives?


Because money isn't my primary aim in life.


I think this law cuts into our freedom as house/apartment owners. I don't think the government should have the right to dictate our lives at such a low-level.


I can't answer the philosophical/ethical question, but on the legal side, if this is considered a kind of "zoning" (prohibiting commercial use of residentially-zoned property), it's long established that that's a permitted kind of regulation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid_v._Ambler


You would also need a permit for your home-based startup, since you are using a portion of your residential space for business purposes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: