Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more trocker's commentslogin

on first look, I'm pretty sure Justin has flattered PG. :D


The comments reading seems to diverge from the main post, but was fun reading anyway.

When I face the same problem and when my head is full of all the noisy - "why is this thing not working, I think I did everything right" s

- I stroll around, walk a mile or two - have some coffee there at some store - look at the people there and think - 'what is running on their mind? Not a buggy code,I guess' - and then come back, stare at the screen and voila! there it is! An insignificant pesky ';' was missing!

So, yes, walk away from your computer. What you and your computer have is a relationship and you need to spend some time apart to realize what you're missing in there.And to get it to work. ;)


Haha, it was fun, wasn't it? :D


Yes,the mankind would literally need to rewrite physics! It will be so exciting to be a part of it!

About the 70's group, can you share the link to the article?


am i the only one that has come to love the scientific method simply because it creates more questions than it answers. there is just so much that we do not and cannot understand. the more we learn, the less we know. fantastic.

on the flipside, i would be certain that certainty is a particular kind of hell, if having such knowledge didn't condemn me to it. excuse me while i proceed to consume my tail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros


+1 here! Questions are fun. I didn't learn my name till people around me bugged me thousands of times a day with the questions -- 'what is your name, you cute little thing?'.

I so so digg your 'the more we learn, the less we know' dialogue.


The Scientific Method could be boiled down to:

10: Question Reality

20: Verify Results

30: GOTO 10


let's try without GOTO:

    while anyone_cares:
        improve_model()
    
        if theory_of_everything_appears or strong_ai_appears:
            raise Exception("rethink loop")


10: Question (the currently accepted model of) Reality

20: Verify Results

30: GOTO 10


Line numbers. Awww yeah!


This is generally the reason in the esoteric studies one does not question a master.

In scientific studies, a question is made and an answer is given. That answer then leads to newer questions further probing the ultimate. One can approach, but never completely know.

In the Occult, one accepts a maxim or answer as an answer. Questioning hinders or derails to what is desired. I am speaking of the ultimate goal of the study of the esoteric: understanding of self.

(You mentioned an occult icon, thereby opening this line of commentary)


http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v248/n5443/abs/248028a0...

I forget the source, but they later tested their setup with random input and found it predicted tachyons from that as well.


Excellent article. Its so true - these days people concentrate on increasing the slide numbers to make it appear as if there is a lot of content in it.No wonder, people hate most of the presentations these days.

'Words' and 'Expressions' along with a meaningful message are the best ways to communicate yourself across to a room full of people. Some visual material is as much important but only 'useful' material.

Rather than wasting your time on thinking 'how to fill N number of slides', it will be a lot more useful if we know our material, practice our material and choose our words carefully. Practice how to engage audience, than trying to make awesome visuals to enchant them with your slide making skills.

Why 'three slide' rule?

Lets make it a 'one' slide rule! :)


Right, how much could that company have sued him for?! Hahhaha, he wouldn't have written this article if not for the risk that he had taken! Its a nice way of telling people -- 'go take risks, be happy man!' :D


If I had $100k, I'd help bootstrapping 5 startups.

I'll wait for 2-5 years for them to grow,and in the mean time the jetpack will become safer!


Is your batting average sufficiently high that 5 start-ups would be enough to get one 'winner' at the percentage you'd invest to make back your 100K?

Especially if you've never done this before I'd expect that you might need a bit more runway than just 100K. YC pulled it off to have reddit and loopt in their first batch but it did take the combined efforts of Robert Morris, Paul Graham, Trevor Blackwell and Jessica Livingston to decide on those five.

It may have helped that for none of them it was the only money they had.

I applaud you for being daring but typically the failure rate of start-ups is such that you'd need pretty deep pockets as an inexperienced and relatively unknown investor to make a go of it.

On top of that you'll be in competition with other incubators with more visibility which likely will attract the 'hot' ones first.


One of the most inspiring comments on this post - 'Sad news. Congrats on what you achieved though. Much respect. Best wishes on your next project.'

Seriously, chad, Congrats. :)


I will not 'agree' or 'disagree'. But I have the same opinion as yours, no more programming languages please!

Help making the present language better, if you really want to!


I see a reason of why yahoo's share rose 81 cents during the after-hours of the CEO fired news.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: