Definitely agree. Kids are not prisoners and will react predictably if you try vainly to lock them down. Theyll find vpns, save money for their own phone, barrow a friends ipad, google the simplest way to jailbreak a cheap IoT device, or any of dozens of ways to subvert lockdown.
Or worse the kid wont be subvertive. Theyll be supplicative, submissive, and compliant.
Maybe just spend a few less hours in the office or on netflix and develop a trust filled relationship with your child, prempting the biggest threats with candid conversation about sex, drugs, risk analysis, and the fact that as a parent we broke all those rules too.
> Kids are not prisoners and will react predictably if you try vainly to lock them down. Theyll find vpns, save money for their own phone, barrow a friends ipad, google the simplest way to jailbreak a cheap IoT device, or any of dozens of ways to subvert lockdown
This all actually seems like good lessons to me. Well, except simply borrowing a friend's ipad. But I guess even just making a close enough friend who trusts them to lend an ipad is still a good skill
I don't know. Maybe kids can benefit from having some artificial boundaries that make them think outside the box and put in effort to overcome
It's funny how people become irrational whenever Trump or this admin is involved. Could this 'immune response' be clouding their thoughts in a way that actually harms their own interests, paradoxically advantaging the 'other side' they seem to fear/dislike?
I have a theory that Trump-hatred (or TDS) is primarily an expression of Boomer values from a majority of the Boomer demographic. Trump seeks to advance the current and future US generations, and Boomers want to maintain their perception of their own socioeconomic dominance, at the cost of all others and all subsequent generations, in a world whose advances they are jealous of. This is then propagated into the coddled or suppressed adult children of Boomers, who then implicitly adopt and express the TDS of their parents, for the draw/inheritance or just the approval - even tho it goes against their own interests!
you're not wrong at all. but then you also have to remember both parties work the exact same way with different colors.
you're right about both the other side as well as about yourself in exactly the same way.
it's not even projection, it's literary the same thing. you could describe yourself and all other t supporters with your text above and change one or two words to account for the color change. but the important parts remain static.
Labeling criticism of Trump, hyperbolic sometimes sure, as a mental health disorder is extremely cult like behavior. Like North Korean level indoctrination.
I've seen this phenomena at two universities. Its gross, dystopian, and eye-opening... unless you're a student who just went through a bingeful finals week and now have to move at extremely short notice.
1) Usually because they can't take it with them. A lot of students fly home, some don't have drivers license, and/or the cost to ship it third party exceeds the price of the items. It's also laziness, but I pin it mainly on practicality and cost.
2) They do, and at Santa Barbara I saw groups gathering, knowing the move-out days, to pick it up. These were migrants, homeless, and thrifty individuals. A lot of the stuff is still in its original packaging, as the parents of the student bought well intentioned but impractical gifts that never even got opened. A lot of room for better organization, but mostly folks just don't care, they're so caught up with finals and getting home that it's very far back in the list of priorities.
3) Picking through trash is a uniquely de-humanizing experience. Its one of the few things that makes me stop walking even in high-homeless areas like the Tenderloin, because I can't even imagine what it feels like to be picking through trash for items to sell, or particularly foodstuffs.
Genuine question - can we even make a convincing argument for security over convenience to two generations of programmers who grew up on corporate breach after corporate breach with just about zero tangible economic or legal consequences to the parties at fault? Presidential pardons for about a million a pop [1]?
What’s the cassus belli to this younger crop of executives that will be leading the next generation of AI startups?
As ethical hackers and for the love of technology, yes we can make a convincing argument for security over convenience. Don't look too much in to it I say; there will always be people convincing talent to do and make things and disregard security and protocol.
Those younger flocks of execs will have been mentored and answer to others. Their fiduciary duty is to share-holders and the business' bottom line.
Us, as technology enthusiasts should design, create, and launch things with security in mind.
Don't focus on the tomfoolery and corruption, focus on the love for the craft.
Looks compelling from the app store page! Because I might use it I have to ask - how do permission work around messages? I'd assume something like this:
* Install App
* App cannot passively READ messages
* When I need to use the app, like in a group chat where we are spontaneously planning an event, I can invite it into the chat so that the group can input their preferences
* Other group members (who may also need to install the app) can interact with the widget to submit their planning prefferences
* Widget then WRITES results back to the chat
Does it ever read my messages? Does it ever write messages to the chat? Does my entire group chat need to install it?
Great work. Seems well targeted and that it could help a lot of folks.
this app never reads any messages. the iMessage framework is very strict around privacy...so much so that you are unable to get user information of. This is why you will see Participate 1, 2, 3 instead of the person's name. There is no way to get this information of who the sender is! Kudos to apple for this.
The only message that is written to the chat is when you hit submit. There is no external service as all information is stored as metadata on the message itself. I did not want to have an external server (which has its own challenges, see in another message around collisions).
Your entire group can see the message but in order to interact with the poll they will need to download the app. They will be redirected to the app store if they do not have the app after clicking.
And IMO it has a long way to go. There is a lot of nuance when orchestrating dependencies that can cause subtle errors in an application that are not easily remedied.
For example a lot of llms (I've seen it in Gemini 2.5, and Claude 3.7) will code non-existent methods in dynamic languages. While these runtime errors are often auto-fixable, sometimes they aren't, and breaking out of an agentic workflow to deep dive the problem is quite frustrating - if mostly because agentic coding entices us into being so lazy.
"... and breaking out of an agentic workflow to deep dive the problem is quite frustrating"
Maybe that's the problem that needs solving then? The threshold doesn't have to be "bot capable of doing entire task end to end", like it could also be "bot does 90% of task, the worst and most boring part, human steps in at the end to help with the one bit that is more tricky".
Or better yet, the bot is able to recognize its own limitations and proactively surface these instances, be like hey human I'm not sure what to do in this case; based on the docs I think it should be A or B, but I also feel like C should be possible yet I can't get any of them to work, what do you think?
As humans, it's perfectly normal to put up a WIP PR and then solicit this type of feedback from our colleagues; why would a bot be any different?
> Maybe that's the problem that needs solving then? The threshold doesn't have to be "bot capable of doing entire task end to end", like it could also be "bot does 90% of task, the worst and most boring part, human steps in at the end to help with the one bit that is more tricky".
Still, the big short-term danger being you're left with code that seems to work well but has subtle bugs in it, and the long-term danger is that you're left with a codebase you're not familiar with.
Being left with an unfamiliar codebase is always a concern and comes about through regular attrition, particularly if inadequate review is not in place or people are cycling in and out of the org too fast for proper knowledge transfer (so, cultural problems basically).
If anything, I'd bet that agent-written code will get better review than average because the turn around time on fixes is fast and no one will sass you for nit-picking, so it's "worth it" to look closely and ensure it's done just the way you want.
The agents will definitely need a way to evaluate their work just as well as a human would - whether that's a full test suite, tests + directions on some manual verification as well, or whatever. If they can't use the same tools as a human would they'll never be able to improve things safely.
> if mostly because agentic coding entices us into being so lazy.
Any coding I've done with Claude has been to ask it to build specific methods, if you don't understand what's actually happening, then you're building something that's unmaintainable. I feel like it's reducing typing and syntax errors, sometime it leads me down a wrong path.
I can just imagine it now, you launch your AI coded first product and get a bug in production, and the only way the AI can fix the bug is to re-write and deploy the app with a different library. Your then proceed to show the changelog to the CCB for approval including explaining the fix to the client trying to explain its risk profile for their signoff.
"Yeh, we solved the duplicate name appearing the table issue by moving databases engines and UI frameworks to ones more suited to the task"
Mind sharing some of your operational choices for hosting/deployment? Which Azure services are you using and what configurations? What kind of throughput are you getting? Any tips regarding migrations? Are you using a dedicated server or VPS?
I'll be doing a similar deployment later this year and enjoy reading on the topic.
Or worse the kid wont be subvertive. Theyll be supplicative, submissive, and compliant.
Maybe just spend a few less hours in the office or on netflix and develop a trust filled relationship with your child, prempting the biggest threats with candid conversation about sex, drugs, risk analysis, and the fact that as a parent we broke all those rules too.
reply