if “AI” says I am smarter than you (and hence better fit for a job both us of might be going after perhaps?) cause I am taller and fatter than you - perhaps :)
Nobody cares what agenda-driven academic organizations have to say about moral issues. People can make up their own minds about what is happening. These sorts of self-aggrandizing pronouncements are patronizing and counterproductive.
Yep. How can it be a genocide when the population of Gaza has been growing crazy fast? And why isn’t Israel’s response just self defense? This seems like subjective judgments by organizations outing themselves as irrelevant.
I prefer to live in a society where adults are free to come to their own arrangements with other adults. Not one where those with a penchant for authoritarianism set terms for others.
Sometimes this system may have warts like not getting to watch Netflix on your Switch, but that seems like a small price to pay for respecting individual autonomy.
In addition, selling information to a government on how to break either system would be more valuable than the amount of bitcoin you would able to sell before exchanges stop accepting deposits or the price crashes.
> In addition, selling information to a government on how to break either system would be more valuable
Honest question because one can find such claims very often on forums like HN:
Does there really exist a "feasible" way how some "lone hacker" could sell such information to some government and become insanely rich?
I know that people who apparently have some deep knowledge about how exploit markets work claimed on HN that "if you have to ask how/where to solve your exploit (i.e. you have the respective contacts), you are very likely not able to".
This latter observation seems a lot more plausible to me than the claim often found on HN that some "lone individual" would be able to monetize on it if he found a way how to break ECDSA or RSA by selling it to some government.
True, we can never know what state actors know that we don't, and my cryptography professor at university taught us that NSA likely had 20 years of mathematical advance over the academic crypto community.
That being said, NFS is almost thirty years old so maybe the NSA doesn't have anything better still.
It's amazing how this catchphrase has reversed meanings for some people. It was previously used against walled gardens and paywalls, but these corporate LLMs are the ultimate walled garden for information because in most cases you can't even find out who created the information in the first place.
"Information wants to be free! That's why I support hiding it behind a chatbot paywall that makes a few people billionaires"
reply