thanks, i started looking at some of the material and i have a hard time believing that it's... ummm.... valid content?
it just kind of seems made up.
like... management leads by relational power, whereas leadership leads by authority power.
what is that?
and these are the terms and categories -- which are words in the English language -- affect these types of deliverable, but if you know English pretty well, that knowledge is going to get in the way of passing this exam -- because we're just arbitrarily making up words and phrases and concepts and lumping them together.
the nomenclature is not completely outlandish, necessarily, but it definitely seems suspect -- from my 15 minutes of review.
i guess i believe that there _is_ a science of project management and that is has valid principles that are actually useful in carrying out serious projects, but.... is this it?
like, _this_ wacky set of arbitrary words and phrases is what guides projects in America and/or the world?
i think the rich will be insulated to a certain extent, but the weather is already making most of the world, including much of the rich, miserable.
i mean, the solution to rich kids is going to be like... don't go outside for the next three months.
if you're a rich adult, you can fly north for the summer, but you'll have to go to.... somewhere where it's not blazing hot in the summer? where is that?
and then you'll be breathing heavy wildfire smoke?
A rich person having to stay indoors more than they like is totally different than a person in Iran or India being cooked alive by 120-150F heat indexes.
I live in the US in a wildfire-affected area, but it’s only incredibly unpleasant for me, not dire.
that's US public policy - fight everything good (democracy) until it becomes clear that we've lost the fight, then at the last moment switch our public stance and say we were for it the whole time - we just wanted some tweaks.
privately, we oppose everything good all the time, from beginning to end -- only the public stance changes.
i'm sure that's the same for Apple and every other big tech firm, every tech firm, every firm.
Why is the autocrat of our company, the CEO, acting like... an autocrat/CEO?
Hmmmmm.
I agree with other commenter - polish up your resume.
You can try to have a chat with them, but they'll hate you and you might get fired.
You can go to the investors, but they'll hate you and you might get fired.
You can send an anonymouse letter to ceo and/or investors and try not to get outed but seeing as how you're brave enough to post here you'll prob be first fired.
I don't think your situation is unique at all.
You can always quit, into another company or not.
If I'm your bestie, I'm saying, don't do shit. Let dictator run it into the ground. Amazingly, they might not. AI is so hot, if you got funding, you might be lucky enough to stick around.
Companies can survive and thrive with even a seemingly-catastrophic amount of mismanagement and chaos -- including nepotism and outright criminal activity.
KGTC keep getting them checks. save your money. start interviewing lightly. try to make it to the point the CEO either runs the company into the ground, or they are pushed out by the investors.
Robot cars, too.