Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | praeivis's commentslogin

Because Chinese clones cost only $30.


Do you have any you'd recommend?


Link or it didn't happen.



Are any of those integrated with a phone? They all look like they are just OBD-II speedometers. $25 for a simple product like that is reasonable.


Only the garmin is integrated via bluetooth. There are chinese clones of the navdy but haven't found a way to purchase them.


There's a comment above (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12790191) that mentions one of the Chinese clones by name: Carrobot. That might help you track one down.


That's the one, I couldn't for the life of me remember the name of it. Not worth tracking them down though after I found out language barrier would be impossible to overcome.



But only if you published your photos in public. If you dont spread your photos around the web you still safe in crowd.


There are all kinds of ways your picture can end up on the web without you putting it there. Perhaps you where at an event where pictures where taken and uploaded to Facebook. Perhaps your company has an employee profiles page. Perhaps you where photographed for your local newspaper a few years ago when you did that things. Saying "I haven't spread my photos thus they don't exist" is extremely naive.


Nope, your lifelong discipline of not publishing a single self-photo online will be undone by someone else who snaps a photo of you and posts it online.


Your picture might already be on the internet. Your friends may have uploaded a picture from a party or school reunion on Facebook. And since Facebook nagged them and they thought it'd be cool to tag you on the picture even though you don't have a Facebook account.


If you have a passport or drivers licens then the government, and thus the police, already have your picture.


I have a colleague / acquaintance who worked laboriously to prevent photos of himself being put online. He avoided all social media, tried to duck out of group photos and used pseudodyms for fora. Searching for him only returned photos of other people sharing his name.

Then one day last year he attended an open-day about retraining IT professionals as teachers. He didn't read the small print closely enough and photos taken at the event were published and studiously tagged by the event organisers. There he was, bubbling up on Google Images.

Subsequently he contacted the organisers and they did remove the tagging, but it was purely by chance that he had discovered it.


What if retail stores take your picture and then match it against your credit card at POS and then automatically identify you in the future as well? I can't imagine this is too far off, if it's not already happening.


I think exactly the opposite is true. "Personal spamming" will probably help you. Spread your photo as much as possible, all with different names and profiles :-)


Findface can't identify you, who are you, why are you walking past my house? I have never seen you before, I'm going to call the police, you're acting strange.


Do you expect police to come every time you see a stranger?


I can imagine things getting to the stage where someone not being findable on the face register is considered suspicious enough for police attention.


Being recognized by police and being recognized by random John Doe are different things.


They won't be.


This was how the Trayvon Martin shooting started: Zimmerman saw someone "suspicious" in his neighborhood and decided to confront him.


Zoommy is available on Windows, OS X and Linux just for $2.99 - how many will buy program to get free photos?



none of C.K. fans going to vote for D.T. anyway, but these who was in doubt most likely dislike C.K., so after all C.K. just done huge favor to D.T.


Nah.


I cant find explanation even for govyty or 1rer :-/


>HoloTour which will offer “users 360-degree panoramic displays of places like Rome and Machu Picchu.

For $3000 now days you can visit half the world.


torrents cant get compromised so you are safe if downloaded via torrents.


Anything what use fingerprint or even face recognition are much more insecure as plain password, just because I can change password whenever I want, but I cant change my fingerprints and especially face.


Sorry about that...PayPal.Me isn't available in your country.


I love how you can't even see FAQ or About pages if you're not in the supported country. That's Google Play Store level UX.


Even if you are in a supported country, when setting up a page, the "Learn more about our fees" page is a 404: https://www.paypal.com/%7BcoBrand%7D/webapps/mpp/paypal-fees


From the FAQ:

> Is PayPal.Me available in my country?

> We’re adding new regions as fast as we can. Check back often to see if it’s available in your country.

That's just seriously bad. "Check back often" -- they won't even provide a list of currently-available countries, let alone a simple "leave your email for updates" box.


That's stupid, how can this kind of thing not be "available" in a country? It's totally isolated from the service


It's a financial service, they're covering their ass from unforeseen tax issues. If some people in Russia decide to use it, and paypal hasn't checked to be sure that this is all completely legit under Russian tax law, there will be huge problems for them.


But the argument is that if you can get a PayPal account in Russia, and if you can send money to that account given the existing PayPal user interface, how is this feature different?


But they won't even know where someone is right? Anyway I understand the point which also makes the argument for cryptocurrencies much stronger


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: