Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | petethepig's commentslogin

I have terabytes of iphone photos/videos accumulated over the years. Apple Photos app is trash when it comes to handling large libraries so I’ve been splitting them by year which is fine for archiving but horrible for actually browsing photos.

Immich has been absolutely awesome for this — I can finally look at all my pictures from any year from anywhere in the world. I’m very happy and hope the creators find a way to sustainably finance the project.

The upload feature in the mobile app is not a 1 to 1 replacement of apple photos import so i still do that via apple photos, but that’s something I can live with.


For a while I was running a windows VM with the iCloud for windows utility that syncs your photos to a folder on your windows PC, iirc it worker reasonably well as an 'automated' sync solution. (under the surface the folder was a share on my NAS, which in turn fed into a separate immich instance)

> Apple Photos app is trash when it comes to handling large libraries

Some would say it's deliberately made to keep the library cluttered so you have to pay more for cloud storage.

Why Are Our Photo Libraries Such a MESS? (Ben Vallack) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsYeVWyNxaY


Many jobs aim to solve problems so well that there’s nothing left to fix — doctors curing illnesses, firefighters preventing fires, police reducing crime, pest control eliminating infestations, or electricians making lasting repairs. And that’s totally fine — people still have jobs, and when it works, it’s actually great for everyone.


> when it works

That’s a load bearing phrase


Would love to see this in Cursor. My workaround right now is using a bunch of rules that sort of work some of the time.


As an ex-Cursor user myself, is there any reason that you’re still using it? Genuinely curious.


I've been using cursor for last 1 year but haven't tried Claude Code, Do you think it has gotten better?


Yes, I abandoned Cursor recently and went back to Claude Code. Two main reasons: 1. The “plan mode” for Claude makes it execute complex tasks much more reliably. It automatically keeps track of todos and completes them. With Cursor I’m constantly fighting with it. 2. I can now use my IDE of choice (JetBrains) rather than a poor fork of VS Code. 3. Daily usage limits now included in the monthly $20/month Claude Pro plan seems to be enough for my daily needs. No extra costs.


I used GitHub copilot in my vscode setup. Claude Code is its agent mode on steroids: highly configurable, seems to have much larger context window, can write "memories", has hooks now. Highly recommend trying it out.

The time it saved me in first few hours of use easily made the monthly fee worthwhile. I did hit a limit near the four-hour mark (resets every five hours for us Pro subscribers), but just went and reviewed the ~1700 lines it added in that time and cleaned up the config files (updated todos etc)


That tab autocomplete and predicting what I'm going to edit next is the best I've found.

The rest I can take or leave (plenty of good or better alternatives)


Claude Code has Cursor integration you can use both


Cursor has the best tab completion model. I use it together with Claude Code.

$20 Cursor Pro plan and $200 MAX Claude Code plan really is a great great pairing.


I was using it for o3 when sonnet is unable to successfully implement something - but I use ZenMCP now.

I still feel like I can review diffs more efficiently in an ide, but I'm pretty much just mosh-ing into my server and have a few tmux windows going and feel I'm starting to get a bit more efficient.

Still considering the Claude max 20x plan to just use opus 100% of the time though


Cursor is still the best when you don’t have access to a Claude subscription.


You get CC when you sign up for their $20 plan also.


Without Opus (larger model), for $20 you get only Sonnet. $100 and $200 plans have Opus.


100$ gets you very little opus


It's honestly so little opus that i'm not sure if $200 would be enough to be useful lol. I use a ton of Sonnet and if Opus was much better i might subscribe to the $200 plan, but it feels like Opus runs out so quick that the 5x to 20x usage would be pointless. Ie 4x (near)0 is still 0 to me.


True, but if the limits are anything like Opus on the $100 plan you won’t get much use out of it :)


To be frank? I can't justify paying for a single-purpose LLM service subscription: Cursor has have a 1-year free educational plan, and for general-purpose multimodal reasoning model work (e.g. OCR, general knowledge reference, math computations, prose processing), I already have a ChatGPT Plus subscription. It's the streaming service dilemma all over again.


Not the first time i see such comparison being made, but it is the first time I see someone go into so much detail about it — great read.


Hi all, wanted to share what we've been working on at Pyroscope.

This is a ChatGPT based Flamegraph explainer. Analyzing flamegraphs can be challenging and we often get questions from users about the best techniques for finding insights from flamegraphs.

We thought maybe we could teach an LLM do this task and turns out it ChatGPT does it pretty well.

You can check out a blog post [0] for a longer explanation for how it all works, or you can upload your own profiles and get insights quickly by going to flamegraph.com [1]

[0] https://pyroscope.io/blog/ai-powered-flamegraph-interpreter/

[1] flamegraph.com


The robotic takeover has already begun; it's just more nuanced and less obvious at this stage.


How much would you pay for a 20x20 inch piece?


hehe, if anyone's interested, I built a similar machine around 2018-2020 [1], although I never automated the nail pick-and-place part of the process. I also used epoxy instead of plaster.

[1] https://www.instagram.com/string.art.bird/


I would suspect you could make some reasonable side money with a large scale version of this, maybe with colored wire, especially with commercial art in mind.

Did you ever consider it?


I did consider it, and I think you're exactly right RE the direction I would go into (colored wire, larger pieces, etc). But then I had a bunch of other things happen in life and so I had to put it all on pause.

The world of art (and especially commercial / corporate art) is very foreign to me, but I bet exploring it would be a fun challenge, so I am planning to do that in a few years.


Some people see innovative ways to combine art and technology.

Some people see money.


I work in automation. My livelihood is making things, unattended. I see my career.

Personally, I think artist should be compensated well. The whole "starving artist" thing isn't just a trope, and I don't think they should be punished like that, "in the name of art!". There are people in my family who were some of the most creative people I know, with art degrees, who have to spend time waiting tables, rather than on art, because because they have stomachs, and don't like the rain.

Money isn't bad, especially if it's from making beautiful things that others value.


Some people see Hacker News internet points.

They are the ones we remember.


Every now and then I remember I'm reading a VC-funded news aggregator.


Nice.

Did you build the CNC yourslef? Do you have any docs about it?

Thank you.


Reminds me of the episode from the Office: "why waste time say lot word when few word do trick" [0]

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K-L9uhsBLM


I love this episode, the art of communication


Compare: Omit needless words.


Dmitry here (Pyroscope cofounder)

This sounds about right.

My favorite little anecdote that I like to tell is that the first thing people often see when they add Pyroscope to their apps is that it takes way less CPU than other signals like tracing or logging. It's pretty common to see logging taking 5-10% of overall CPU utilization.

The other 90% is usually spent doing serialization / deserialization (half-joking).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: