Is it? I have my personal anecdote. Most outrageous, fearful and dangerous (for my life and health) interactions with other people I had in public transport.
It sounds like you recognise that they encourage human interaction, though. Learning how to navigate human interaction is very rewarding and it's at the core of what we're losing.
Not sure I want dangerous human interactions and ability to navigate them to learn. Pretty much how I don’t want to learn navigating jungle on practice.
I was fortunate to fly an Air France Concorde between JFK and CDG and, while the seats were leather (which was not the case in economy at the time), they were no larger than economy seats.
The windows were tiny and the cabin itself was also quite small. It definitely felt cramped.
The ones at air shows felt more specious than the commercial ones. Or at least that’s how it was from my admittedly very limited first hand experience.
5 years ago my parents in Russia didn’t know word VPN. Now they know that witeguard is better than openvpn. Reason: they want to use instagram and youtube (both are blocked).
Chatgpt is more valuable than instagram. I believe people will find the way.
Why would carbon dioxide be a problem? I’ve always thought that oxygen levels are the most important factor. Even if carbon dioxide doubled, it would not make a significant difference.
In indoor environments, we use carbon dioxide as a signal that oxygen levels are low.
You are. The brain actually responds to CO2 concentration, not oxygen concentration. Your metabolism turns O2 and various hydrocarbons into CO2 and water, but many of the feedback loops in this process that mediate how your body metabolizes are based on the CO2 concentration; so even if O2 is unchanged, if you body detects more CO2, it will start metabolizing less.
I also wonder that if we have bigger body volumes combined with lower lung and heart capacity due to inactivity, would that add to the negative cognitive affect of higher CO2?
That may have been true 4 years ago but it’s far from true now. The only feature Tesla has that no other car seems to have is that minimalist “dentist’s waiting room decorated in the 1990s to seem futuristic” energy from the interior, which definitely sets Tesla apart although not entirely in a good way.
I don’t think this discussion makes sense without pointing to specific models. And discussing specific models doesn’t make sense without establishing what are the set of required properties (which is different for everyone). I was just pointing out that for some people (including me) there are no other cars with similar properties that I need.
reply