Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nrdgrl's commentslogin

Most women's clothes don't have pockets...


Exactly. At the entry level end we should talk about the number of employees who end up on flaming out or on short term disability from the stress.


Not even just at entry level. Gas lighting and bullying at this company are nuts, people constantly having breakdowns and having to go on stress leave, looking forward to more updates of and when this guy stops drinking the cool aid.


Especially a bin with tons of people standing really close to.


Yikes. Nope, I live in Canada and I had a few tens of thousands in debt forgiven. Definitely didn't have to pay taxes on it. That would be absolutely crazy and would have driven me to bankruptcy!


Not judging you at all, I promise. I found it ironically funny that forgiving debt could lead someone into bankruptcy. Talk about a win-win situation.


Yep. In my case we were overjoyed having finally worked out a deal with the bank, only to discover that now I was in debt to the IRS instead of the bank :'(

It sure feels like your government is shitting on you during an already tough situation.


So the idea is the bank gave you a loan then forgave it, so it’s now income? That’s a big leap in logic and sounds evil considering you never consider that when getting a loan, you only expect the internet to accrue.


It is income. Someone gave you money. Otherwise, why wouldn’t a company “loan” you a higher salary and then just “forgive” the debt? Or, you could set up a company to loan yourself money — the company deducts the “loss” and you don’t pay taxes on the gain.


The principal is presumably income, however the interest or fees should not be. The IRS will even occasionally cancel debt that’s mostly fines and interest without considering it income.


Like all laws there should be some context. But I guess you’re right it’s an easy loophole to exploit and the simpler the tax law the better.


The IRS definitely (as definite as a capricious federal bureaucracy can be) let you make payments on the taxes in that situation.


This. Despite what many people think, the IRS doesn’t want to bankrupt people. They’ll work with you and set up a payment plan if necessary.


Yep me too. It's crazy. I had to consult with a bankruptcy lawyer because of this. I couldn't believe it.


What kind of amount in tax are you talking about? Is it net profit anyway compared to paying back tens of thousands?


Answer a survey question to continue reading article...


It sounds like apple requires the data in JSON format - they may not have a choice.


> A $350 for an esthetily pleasing comfortable sturdy bra is a no brainier purchase when it's such a QoL improvement, you wear it everyday, and the alternative is a string of cheap bras that won't be that much cheaper in the long run and fit/feel worse.

Yes. You absolutely hit the nail on the head. I would _happily_ pay this much for a very comfortable bra, and it's reasonable given the quality of bras in the $100-200 range (I've owned several, although I got them at 50-75% off). That said I'll probably never be able to afford a $350 bra again in my life.


If you were buying $100-$200 bras at 50% discount then you were not buying $200 bras - you were buying $50-$100 bras.

If a brand is refusing to sell $350 bra at 50% off, then it is a $350 bra. Otherwise $350 is MSRP aka the wishing price. If they do 50% off sales then it is a $175 bra. $175 makes it a premium product but not a boutique level premium. Maybe there's a market for $175 bras -- VS tried it in 2005-2007 in some markets but they did not quite sell it was dropped in 2008.

Hermes does not do sales, which is why a a Kelly 22 is $7,200 while LV Speedy is $800 and not $1,400 (Hermes does not do sales and LV does), so Hermes talks about number of units of a kind they ship while LV talks about average revenue per unit of a kind shipped.

P.S. VCs are very bad at funding apparel manufacturers. They pick the ones that they think should work which tend not to be the ones that actually work.


Thank you for mansplaining that to me.


It is money-splaining. Unfortunately it is not done enough.


How do you know they are a man?


Also because every city gets to set their own consumption bylaws, many people who rent have nowhere to legally smoke it. eg: Calgary - public smoking is banned. You're allowed to smoke it in your own house. Except most rental companies have banned smoking on rental property (inside or outside). So the only way to smoke legally could get you evicted.


Good - the smell is nasty and a nuisance for both tenants and the general public.


I think just about any woman knows, 20% is very low (and unlikely). From my own personal experience I'd be shocked if it wasn't clover to 60%.


I once drove the highway through the white sands missile range, 2 days in a row (tourist). I went through a DHS checkpoint twice where they checked my ID and asked detailed questions about where I was going and why. The second day they wanted to know why I had gone two days in a row. There are (where back then anyway) big barriers they would lower to close a portion of the highway during 'missile' tests.

A fascinating place to visit.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: