Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nategri's commentslogin

I've got a big text file of 6502 machine code I wrote a few years back that I pull out and marvel at from time to time. One of those things that you have to be fully in the "zone" to pull off, so it seems like magic to present-day me.


When all you have is a hammer everything looks like an IBM clone, I guess.


Ugh that namesake story is maximum Wall Street culture cringe.


They still donated to a zoo. I'm ok with them acting like little kids in exchange.


Sure, I admit it's a bit cringey, but think about what Wall Street guys spend money on. Would people rather they buy more cocaine, or contribute to a zoo?


I thought that was hilarious.


Sounds like it might be a good pick as the energy source for an extremely long haul interstellar probe?


It's already used (minus the diamond casing), e.g. in the Curiosity mars rover, or the Voyager probes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curiosity_(rover)#Specificatio... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_ge...


Defender is probably one of the hardest games ever made, if only because of the wacky controls (a 1D joystick that only moves your ship up and down, and a button for reversing your direction).


Would expect this to clock in somewhere in the neighborhood of $80 using my preferred fab of OSHPark, but their min. order is 3 boards. So if you find two other people who want one, you get one from there for under $30 or so.


Would posit that HN is well into its "endless september" at this point.


Learning about multiple wonderful things at once here. This is pretty much catnip for 6502 fans.


While we're still perfecting the renewable situation we need to shut down all this coal bullshit ASAP and patch in nuclear. I guess people would rather be definitely killed by particulates and climate change rather than almost never killed by radiation---just because it sounds scarier. Madness.


I support nuclear too, but the fact is - nuclear is a political hot potato and encumbered by enormous financial uncertainty.

If you wanted to spend $1B on energy, spending it on nuclear would be a crapshoot, while spending it on solar or solar + batteries would lead to implementation relatively quickly.

It's unfortunate given this table:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density#Tables_of_energ...


You have it backwards. We need to patch in fast-to-build renewable and imperfect storage capacity while continuing to research nuclear fusion. Fission plants however are both uneconomical and slow to build - to the point that even the fastest builds of already safety reviewed designs would not complete until after our fate in climate change is largely irreversibly decided.


"Nuclear power; the world's most expensive way to boil water".

Luckily, there are many cheaper power alternatives that don't involve the problem of having to bury nuclear waste for THOUSANDS of years.


Author here.

They’re not actually that radioactive so they’re very easy to get ahold of. Amazon and eBay might work (I got mine from one of those sources, I think), but I also put a more specialized supplier in the parts list.


Grab some Torbernite!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: