Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mousa's comments login

I think the disclosure procedures were abandoned because people outside of the loop had figured it out from Linux kernel upgrades.


Also by AMD's e-mail that all-but-disclosed the mechanism of Meltdown.


AIUI disclosure wasn't supposed to happen until tomorrow. Google broke the embargo because, as you said, people were starting to figure it out.


Breaking the embargo at 5pm EST was also coordinated with everyone who had been disclosed early. It wasn't anarchy.


Why shouldn't they? I personally like the answers and use them often if I'm trying to find a fact, like when someone famous was born. If someone is going to blindly trust Google without verifying and google doesn't try to answer, they'll probably just trust whatever site is listed first anyways...

I see no harm in Google guessing.


Probably doesn't hurt business as the new people who rent there will have more money


We damn well won't, since the jobs around Boston really don't pay salaries commensurable with Boston rents.


>more irregular in size than wheat berries

Wheat is one of those plants that humans have mastered. One person can farm thousands of acres of wheat. Generally that's only true of plants that are very uniform and that you wipe out each harvest. It would be very hard to replace it with a plant you can't use the same techniques on as the labor would be 100x probably.


We're on the cusp of an era with an embarrassment of labour, however. This sort of crop might not be useful yet, but heterogeny is going to be a theme when gains to date in informatics and robotics begin to be reflected in mature agricultural technologies.


Kernza is harvested (and planted) with the same equipment that wheat is. Some irregularity isn't going to matter.


As the seeds are much smaller, this may or may not be the case. The article mentions mills not being able to handle the size, but it could also affect other things.


The seeds are huge compared to, say, quinoa, which is also harvested using a regular old combine. My comment wasn't hypothetical. That is how it is harvested already.


Breeding is increasing the size of the grains.


There is one tiny little mention of Waymo in there but that's clearly the main push for Google in robotics now, and if that's where those robotics aquihires went maybe that's what they wanted.


I wonder if that's because self-driving cars are not how the general public expects robots to look like. C-3PO, R2-D2, and those orange arms in factories are what most people imagine when they think about robots.


Or because it's a bigger market? How much do most Americans spend on transportation compared to say, things that come out of assembly lines? And how much value can robots add to each of those verticals?


A robot that prepares my dinner is more valuable to me than a self driving car.

Why? Well, when I leave work, I spend 45 minutes in the car, and another 45 minutes preparing dinner. With self driving cars, that will not change. But with self cooking chefs, that would add 45 minutes of quality time to my day.


According to the most recent data from the Department of Transportation, there are 11.3 million motor vehicle accidents a year in America, with 2.4 million people injured in said accidents. 2016 was the deadliest year in almost 10 years, with about 40,000 traffic deaths—up about 2,000 over 2015.

The economic impact of car accidents is almost as staggering as the numbers of injuries and lives lost. The total economic impact of car crashes is a whopping $871 billion in the U.S. (http://www.thedrive.com/sheetmetal/13792/car-accidents-cause...)

The revenue of the entire restaurant industry is less than that total economic impact ($799 billion http://www.restaurant.org/News-Research/Research/Facts-at-a-...)


The correct source is:

The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/...

Note that these numbers are made up to a certain degree, much more so than the restaurant industry numbers, and so they are not necessarily comparable. The NHTSA puts the value of one life at $8.86 million (in 2010 dollars) [p. 114 of the report]. For 40,000 deaths, that's already $354 billion. They then add other costs, too, which are also hard or impossible to measure.


Things like this make me wonder if I just have an extreme lack of... grit, or tolerance for risking other people's lives or something. I mean, the idea of spending an hour and a half a day driving, experimentally, means I break after a few months even if the job is relatively stress free. (now, experimentally, I can ride a lot longer than I can drive, but I'm one of those people who can read while in a moving vehicle.)

I know this is a normal thing that normal people do; I know people who do it, but it is something I personally find incomprehensibly difficult.


I bought a house to cut a 45 minute commute down to 15. I don't want to imagine commuting any further than that. It's just such a waste of time.


You can already buy prepared food, the same way you can already get a taxi.

The difference is that a self driving taxi will be far cheaper than a taxi, partly because it can be shared.

A robot that prepared food already exists, it's called a factory, but food is far more variable in terms of people's desires.


The self driving car brings you dinner at an affordable price.

It makes more sense for the dinner cooking robot to be making thousands of meals a day than just two for you each day.


What you really need is a car oven and dashboard hob in your self-driving car.


Thank you for this inspirational quote, which I distributed to the team at Infinite Food this morning to start our week! http://infinite-food.com/

We are building a network of automated food preparation and retail service locations for high density mainland Chinese cities, with a view toward international expansion.

Your statement concurs with the results of a study published in PNAS and reported in NYT recently regarding cross-demographic improvements in happiness resulting from increased spending on time-saving - http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2017/07/18/1706541114.full and https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/27/science/study-happy-save-...


Your car isn't the sum total of what you spend on transportation. Every loaf of bread and gallon of milk was also transported a fairly long distance to arrive at your local supermarket. All the Uber stories here would lead you to believe that the initial thrusts for self driving cars will be in transporting humans, but I find it much more likely that the initial rollout of self-driving technology will, instead, be focused on moving stuff.

Truck driver is, IIRC, the largest single job description in the US. That's a huge target market for self-driving technology and a massive societal problem that's looking when so many people are left jobless.


Or you could just order delivery? Sometimes I miss living in china for this reason.


Self driving cars should reduce your commute significantly


In the transportation market, it may be possible to own the ordering and aggregation process , which in certain scenarios become something with a strong network effects, hence strong barriers to competition .

Robotics in general may not have strong barriers.


I don't understand this question, all moving vehicles are built on assembly lines.


Most of your transportation cost isn't buying the vehicle, it's fuel, parking and upkeep.

Even in the cost of buying the vehicle, it is already highly automated, how much can more robots decrease the price of the car?


Sure but would people when asked "is the car from Knight Rider a robot?" they'd probably answer yes though they think of it as a car first.

I think it's a case that will be reinforced with the first viable self driven car.


But like the rest of the efforts listed, that's not on the market at the moment. It probably isn't that close either, since there is no official release date.


Nest and Google Home are on the market. They meet the definition of robot, but fall into the same problem the parent mentions.


> I wonder if that's because self-driving cars are not how the general public expects robots to look like.

Transformers are cars that drive themselves.


Noone in the world thinks Baidu gives good results.


It would make it hard to pretend that the DDG results were much better than those irrelevant Google results that more fanatical Googlephobes insist they get.


Can't really blame him, it might seem kind of arrogant to refuse to do the task they give and propose one yourself, although it is pretty impressive that you could do something useful on a codebase you haven't seen during the code interview.


It doesn't feel that bad either. I thought I'd be miserable but this dry heat is painless compared to 90s in the East.


Yeah, it's a dry heat, thankfully. 100° without humidity is better than 90° with 80% humidity, IMO. Fans are much more effective when it's dry; when it's humid, the evaporative cooling that they're supposed to create doesn't work as efficiently.


I used to live in Kansas City, Missouri. There it is not uncommon for it to be 100+ with 90% humidity. I'll take this any day.


You don't get a new bike every year. You're talking about a 1 time payment for all 65+. After that just give it to everyone who turns 65.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: