Actually I did take a moment and within the first 39 minutes of research I discovered laziness or a lie on Obama’s part and from there I could not help but wonder what other forms of misinformation must exist.
“Very little is actually about execution, because the execution's primary purpose is to represent the idea. It's the actual idea that contains the values.” This quote from the article is a strange reflection of what the world of software development teaches.
My take on it is that it is the artist that brings the idea and make it come to light, they do this by letting other people do the work but they are still the visionaries and in charge of the execution of art.
Good examples of ideas and execution is plentyfull in both software and art, just because you get both of them right doesn't mean you will succeed.
This just doesn’t represent reality of contemporary art. It’s a bullshitters game. These artists almost never even have a vision that is important to them. They behave as such, but the project motivations are consistently reflexive. They are just a response to what they thing will help their recognition. This is just not about expression.
Historically, this is extremely wrong. Renaissance artists were the technicians of course. That’s what they were known for.
This is the rot of an industry built on extracting funds from overly wealthy patrons with no limit to the amount of dishonesty.
"Renaissance artists were the technicians of course. That’s what they were known for."
That's only partially true.
While Renaissance masters usually had the skill to execute a fully finished work, and probably did so during their own apprenticeship, by the time they became masters they often had workshops of dozens or even hundreds of assistants who did almost all of the work for them. After the work was almost complete, the master might come in and put on some finishing touches.
There's lots of art out there these days that's misattributed to the master when it was actually done by one of his assistants in the workshop, whose training was usually centered around creating art that looked just like the master's.
The difference is that software has to be functional. You can literally call a urinal or a can of soup "art", and if your "idea" (i.e. social status) is good enough then people will believe you.
Emin's "Unmade Bed" - pretty sure that, eg from the title, was cocking-a-snook at the establishment in a "let's see what crap I can make them buy". Though it does have a place in an area of art that intrigues me, that of "uncreated" or "unconsciously created" works.
If you think Duchamp was pulling a fast one you'll probably think Emin to be some sort of queen of hustlers.
CNN, the guardian, and the Washington Post could also work under that principle after all the misinformation and falsehoods they have published this year.
Unless you are building a time machine, what are the other distractions more beneficial to improving the present than using that precious time to consern yourself with the far past mistakes made by humans?
I am about to go put myself at risk right now with a casual partner. I believe in a another simulation where porn did not exist I’d be snuggled up and listening to some snores of my beautiful wife and newborn. But it exists and grows.
