Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lisptime's commentslogin


That article is saying the exact same thing that I'm saying.


In a democracy, that public support really matters.

Indeed.

Since the end of World War II, there have been 248 armed conflicts in 153 locations around the world. The United States launched 201 overseas military operations between the end of World War II and 2001, and since then, others, including Afghanistan and Iraq.

http://scientistsascitizens.org/2014/05/15/academics-and-sci...


Yeah, my point wasn't that democracies don't wage wars -- just that they can't ignore the will of the citizenry (unless they don't actually have a democracy).

As an American, the USA's bottomless well of rah-rah nationalism any time they trot out the troops has always been a mystery. But it's definitely there, and I don't think any other country since the USSR has come close to the USA in terms of attacking other countries.

I also disagree with the comment below about a war-weary USA having a tepid response to China seizing a minor uninhabited American island. I think public support for a military response would be huge, like always.

What I was saying was that in Japan specifically, that knee-jerk support would not be there.


Huge support would be a massive understatement. Half the congress would be for an all out ICBM strike and other half would be for levelling the country and sending it back to stone age.


... Japan’s diplomats say their country “discovered” the islands in 1884.

... They are recorded in “Voyage with a Tail Wind”, published in 1403, a portolano recounting a journey from Fujian province to Ryukyu, the old name for the Okinawa chain of islands. By the following century, in “A Record of an Imperial Envoy’s Visit to the Ryukyu Kingdom”, Chinese names were given to all the islets in the Diaoyu group. Japanese diplomats do not bring it up, but the great Japanese military scholar, Shihei Hayashi, followed convention in giving the islands their Chinese names in his map of 1785, “A General Outline of Three Countries” (see map). He also coloured them in the same pink as China.

http://www.economist.com/news/christmas/21568696-behind-row-...


Following the same logic, the Portuguese would now own half of the World and the Spanish another half.

Like any large country that tastes power and prosperity for a couple decades, China got rich with money from exports and drunk with power, and like any other country including the U.S. it will not end well. Too bad i makes life miserable for their neighbors too.



thanks for sharing



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: