Isn't this already the case? Perhaps you mean in a non-transient fashion, i.e. internalizes the in-context learning into the model itself, sort of an ongoing training, that isn't sort of a "hack" like writing notes or adding to a RAG database or whatever.
> This will drive a lot of young ambitious people to insanity. Nothing meaningful for them to achieve.
Maybe, if the only flavor of ambition you're aware of is that of SV types. Plenty of people have found achievement and meaning before and alongside the digital revolution world.
I mean common people will be affected just as badly as SV types. It will impact everyone.
Jobs, careers, real work, all replaced by machines which can do it all better, faster, cheaper than humans.
Young people with modest ambitions to learn and master a skill and contribute to society, and have a meaningful life. That can be blue collar stuff too.
How will children respond to the question - "What do you want to be when you grow up?"
They can join the Amish communities where humans still do the work.
It's not an example. It's not even close. You can and should want something more substantial than this if you're going to make such a sweeping conclusion!
What makes a remotely hosted MCP server less secure? The alternative, and what most of MCP consists of at the moment, is essentially running arbitrary code on your machine, as your user, and hooking this up to an LLM.
I think this is a great and incomplete collection of all the ways life has improved(and continues to improve), I wish it had more purchase with doomers.
The cheerleaders don't care. Americans' relative certainty and quality of life is backstopped by institutions they either barely understand or have never heard of. Let them touch the stove, I guess.
reply