Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kitd's commentslogin

From the Introduction [1]

    Many container platforms are available, but Apptainer is focused on:

    Verifiable reproducibility and security, using cryptographic signatures, an immutable container image format, and in-memory decryption.

    Integration over isolation by default. Easily make use of GPUs, high speed networks, parallel filesystems on a cluster or server by default.

    Mobility of compute. The single file SIF container format is easy to transport and share.

    A simple, effective security model. You are the same user inside a container as outside, and cannot gain additional privilege on the host system by default. Read more about Security in Apptainer.
[1] https://apptainer.org/docs/user/main/introduction.html

A lot of the fancy CLIs I use have a `--json` option that gives the user the chance to pipe output to eg jq and process it there. I find that a good alternative to running stuff through cut, sed or awk before processing.


11A was next to the emergency exit. There was a comment on Reddit suggesting he actually bailed just before impact.


That doesn't make sense. 100+mph into terrain is going to go way worse for you out of a seat than in it.


Not if you ride the door!


You ~cannot~ don't want to "bail just before impact"

A plane at takeoff is pressurized, and that pressure holds the doors closed, as well as the physical locks. You cannot open it.

Don't believe random reddit comments. Average people know less than nothing about planes.

Speaking of random people knowing less than nothing: I believed that at takeoff and landing, planes were slightly overpressurized to increase airframe rigidity. I think I got that impression from a very old pilot, so either it used to be true or it was never true and I'm just wrong.

This person probably did not bail out of the plane in order to survive, but maybe you COULD open the doors at takeoff and landing, not that you want to.

Additional edit: I've actually flown a few times while running the barometer on my phone for funzies. I might be able to find a log of data to confirm or deny my mistaken belief! It's fun to do because you can see the pressurization increase signalling that the pilots are preparing for descent even before they tell you!


The pressure inside is not more than atmospheric pressure at the ground. In fact I think they only maintain the pressure of around 1000m or so. There would be absolutely no point pressurising the cabin higher than atmospheric pressure at sea level and if they did you'd feel it before the plane took off.


Proposed enhancement to Graal Native Image compiler to allow JIT-compiled code to be linked at runtime.


> Another prize is also awarded annually to people who have made important progress in studying IUT – the first such prize, with an award of $100,000, went to Mochizuki and his colleagues.

Well that's hardly suspicious at all.


Reads like the Obama giving himself an award meme


For those confused like me, this is unrelated to the popular terminal emulator called Terminator [1]. Confusing choice of name IMHO.

[1] https://gnome-terminator.org/


That's wild, I thought it was referencing a popular 80s action movie by James Cameron, but yeah then I clicked, and realized it was neither.


I too was confused by this. Terminator is my go to terminal emulator. I think this namespace is a bit crowded.


s/censorship/content curation/


They feel quite similar to Alexa skills, packaged in a standard form. The app store analogy allows them to be searched by the end user.

TBH, it's quite surprising (and reassuring) that they have standardised as MCPs so soon. It normally takes a decade of walled gardens and proprietary formats before any open standards emerge.


Part of that though was that he was Polish, at a time when Poland and other Eastern European countries were Communist dictatorships. He represented in part a kind of "insurgency" against them.


The first non-Italian pope since the 1500s. For comparison, note the 1968 movie The Shoes of the Fisherman, in which a priest from Russia unexpectedly becomes pope and provokes great political change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shoes_of_the_Fisherman_(fi...


OS/2 was created by the biggest computer company in the world at the time, yet even it couldn't get enough traction.

In the world of OSes, "the same as what everyone else is using" is much more important than "new takes on old concepts".


Of course, when it was more expensive than MS-DOS 5/Windows 3.1 combo hardware requirements, what to expect.

In today's money, going with OS/2 instead would have cost me 1000 euros more when I bought my 386 PC.


It came a few years to early. I remember my shock when I get [1] my OS/2 copy and it was on 10 (yes, ten!) 3.5 inch Floppy Disk, while Windows needed two (one for main OS, one for some utilities).

[1] This was 1987 still communistic Poland, so I bought a pirated copy on a famous Warsaw computer bazaar on Grzybowska street.


I don't think you are remembering correctly.

> It came a few years to early. I remember my shock when I get [1] my OS/2 copy and it was on 10 (yes, ten!) 3.5 inch Floppy Disk

Not so bad, really.

> while Windows needed two (one for main OS, one for some utilities).

No version of Windows came on 1 floppy.

Windows 1.01 took 4 360k disks -- here's a picture:

https://www.firstversions.com/2015/05/microsoft-windows.html

Windows 2 took 8 360k disks:

https://archive.org/details/microsoft-windows-v2.0

Windows 3 took 8 even on DS DD 720kB disks:

https://archive.org/details/windows_3.00_english_with_ms-dos...

By Windows 95 it was up to 27 high density 1.4MB disks:

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/uopb1n/t...

10 is not bad at all for a full preemptive multitasking x86-32 OS with a GUI, IMHO.


Agreed. Their timing was not right. But once Windows 95 hit, it was over. Also, the RAM requirements made it pretty much impossible for people to recommend to their friends and family.

I really had a special fondness for OS/2. But using it today, it really is a quirky thing. Maybe if it had won I wouldn't be thinking that way.


> Their timing was not right.

I agree.

https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/05/microsoft_os2_flop_fu...

I think OS/2 1.x should have targeted the 386, in the 1980s.

> Also, the RAM requirements made it pretty much impossible for people to recommend to their friends and family.

I bought OS/2 2.0 with my own cash, and ran it on several different 386SX machines in 4MB of RAM. It was usable on that spec.

Any good spec of machine for Windows 3.0 could run OS/2 2.x usefully without being unpleasant.


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: