Isn't this just going to drive all the tracking serverside?
Hash up the tracking data in the app, send it back to the app's servers, send it to whoever you like? Same is happening with browsers and 3rd party cookies.
Sort of. I was thinking how tracking will respond now. And the answer is known: device fingerprinting, i.e. collecting all accessible device details to uniquely identify it. But since Apple fights fingerprinting too to certain extent, this sort of tracking will not be as accurate as the current identifier tracking. Also, it is significantly harder to implement. So, some monetary losses for the likes of Facebook are given.
Rock solid. We've have had 2 fire 7's in our house for 1.5 years, in the hands of a now 8 and 6 year old and no issues. Things are covered in gunk (like how they manage the touch screen is beyond me), and they keep going.
I don't use unlimited, I've side loaded play store, set age range, enabled full parental controls on play store and on the tablet themselves... They have full control, but web is blocked etc. Play store is great, tells them they need to uninstall things to install the next game. They don't need my interaction to install X or Y now.
They did manage to download an app that let them have full access to unfiltered youtube, but we caught that pretty quick. YouTube kids is great as well.
Oh I hate CVT. I've got a Land Rover Discovery 3 with a non-CVT auto and it's as smooth as anything changing gear, you just don't notice.
Looking at getting an auto for our second smaller car, and CVT is like someone has an elastic band on the gears. Would drive me up the wall. The Citroen box at least comes with paddles which helps.
The VW/Audi dual clutch box is the best, you get the economy of CVT and it's so much smoother. Shame they are so much more expensive second hand than CVT autos :(
The TV Licence funds the BBC content, which is Free to Air TV, online stuff, Radio etc. It has no ads and aims to have as much diverse stuff as possible.
I'm also happy to pay, and feel sorry for Americans who have to put up with inferior public TV services.
Not only is the BBC awesome, the licence fee is much lower than cable or satellite charges, and BBC programmes are not stuffed with mind-numbing adverts.
The BBC is awesome, but the TV License is incredibly regressive (it's basically a poll tax), and has failed at making them independent of parliament (instead of a parliamentary debate over how much money to give the BBC, we just get a parliamentary debate over how much the license fee should be). And their enforcers are... not nice, and an incredibly inefficient use of human labour. It would be better to fund the BBC from general taxation.
So he isn't pushing anything, both things can be valid.
You don't "need" jQuery, but you might not-not need jQuery unless you do something about those bugs.
yell.com mobile site removed jQuery from their codebase, and used that list during the process. Looking at each bug, does it affect them, yes/no. If yes, code around it.
I'm a jQuery fan, but sometimes you might not need jQuery, but sometimes you might not-not need jQuery
Hash up the tracking data in the app, send it back to the app's servers, send it to whoever you like? Same is happening with browsers and 3rd party cookies.