There's no extra cost for extra domains, on everything but their smallest account — and as we already have an account for all of our other domains, using Migadu for side projects as well is a no-brainer.
This has been my goto React UI framework for a number of years now - and has helped me deliver a number of projects, ranging in size from big to small. It’s consistent, well thought out, and both clients and users like it.
I've not evaluated either of those two in the past, no. Neither of them existed last time I looked for decent competitors to Ant Design's library.
Hmm. When I go to the MUI website right now — e.g. https://mui.com/x/react-data-grid/ — and then click the hamburger menu, top-left, the resulting menu just goes nuts, glitching and toggling on and off, non-stop (Safari 17.5, on macOS Monterey). So I am unable to even look at MUI properly currently. So, quite honestly, that's the end of any further evaluation there for now. Arguably: it doesn't bode too well, but maybe they're just having a bad day? (I notice that Ant's website is totally down currently also, which I've not seen in a very long time — perhaps it's had- or they have both had- the HN hug of death?)
— But TBH, based upon what I've just read on their site: MUI isn't really going to be an option for us, because of its commercial licensing.
But their stuff might be worthy of consideration / buying a license, if their stuff totally wowed me — but the bar is set quite high with Ant, which has a lot of components, with a lot of functionality, and is fully open-sourced (and backed by some big companies, and with years of development behind it already). Their table (data grid) looks ok, but a bunch of the features (which Ant has) are commercial-only.
A quick look at Chakra shows that doesn't have a date picker, nor a calendar, and their table is nothing more than a nicely styled basic HTML table — no additional functionality — no sorters, no pagination, no filters, no row selection, no fixed-columns, all of which, and more, Ant's table already has — Granted it can likely be coupled with the likes of TanStack Table to add some of these, but that's just more work when one just wants something that just works straight out-of-the box (and TanStack Table still doesn't cover everything that Ant does).
Ant Design also has a good handful of other quite useful components, that I don't see in Chakra — Chakra seems to have about half the amount of components?
In short, to me, Chakra seems a bit too new / immature — or perhaps simply has a smaller scope? — when compared with the likes of Ant Design's React component library — which, for desktop apps, is certainly much closer to being 'enterprise grade', straight out-of-the-box, with no messing about (e.g. with third-party components, perhaps less well maintained).
It looks promising though — but I've looked at plenty of other UI libraries over the years that looked promising in their early days, but never grew particularly much, so we'll have to wait and see. But right now, it's some way from being usable on much of the stuff that I build.
I've only ever used MUI, myself, and was curious to know what others thought of similar projects. Sounds like Ant is truly FOSS and more powerful in some ways.
No need to keep Mojave to run iTunes — iTunes can be run on newer macOS, by using Retroactive [1] to patch it.
Regarding running a newer macOS on older hardware, check out OCLP [1] — do make sure you make full backups and have a working recovery plan before trying anything with OCLP though. I know that might sound somewhat obvious to a lot of folk, but you'd be surprised at the amount of folk that jump in and try OCLP on their main system without any backup plan.
Note that are some gotchas re installing OCLP on some older h/w, and it will help to read up on possible issues before wading in. e.g. during installation it might be necessary to use a wired keyboard and mouse, via a USB hub, until the installation is done, you might also need a wired network connection during install, similarly. Depends on h/w (I've not patched MacBooks myself, yet). Once the patcher is done, these should not be needed anymore.
Official support for OCLP is only via Discord — but there is a very active unofficial peer/user support group on FB [3]
Headline here is misleading: it's not a Boston Dynamics' robot dog. It's made by Petoi, and called Bittle.
— I own one, after backing the kickstarter for it.
It's a cool introduction to microcontrollers, programming and such. Although it's more at the animatronics end of the scale than full-blown robotics, due to the usefulness and quantity of the sensors on it. It's quite versatile though, for what it is: has a few expansion parts (sensors, alternate controller board, etc) available from the same company, and can kinda connect to any stuff one might connect to a hobbyist microcontroller.
The code for it is actively developed on Github (OpenCat).
> I failed to find a face in the original article.
The second image in the original Ars Technica article shows the side view of its head/face very clearly. According to the caption: its head is still partly enclosed in the concretion it was found in — which IMO gives it the appearance of having its head resting on a rock.
After looking at that, and the third image — an artist's rendition of how it might have looked when alive — the first image should make more sense: its snout is at the front of the image, the bulges of both its eye sockets are clearly visible slightly further back, and the creature looks like it is laying down (and has been somewhat flattened) facing towards the camera, looking slightly to the right of the photographer.
I'm not sure I understand your comment here? Are you referring to the end of your MacBooks' life, or the beginning? It's somewhat ambiguous.
Assuming you are referring to end of life process:
Apple's kit sold as refurb is done from their incoming returns — faulty, or otherwise unwanted, systems.
Everything sent to them as a trade-in isn't handled by Apple at all: it's contracted out to third-party companies. (This likely applies to their recycling programme also, but I've not looked into it)
At least: these things certainly used to be the case — and there have been a whole bunch of articles online that support this, over the years. I would love to see evidence to the contrary if things have changed?
— But like I said: I'm not sure I understand your comment, so maybe my points here are irrelevant.
There's no extra cost for extra domains, on everything but their smallest account — and as we already have an account for all of our other domains, using Migadu for side projects as well is a no-brainer.