Also, games grew well beyond what would be reasonable to send over Usenet. There was really only a time in the late 90s when games were small enough to not require you split them into literally millions of parts. This happened to coincide with the maximum popularity of the Usenet, but as a distribution platform today it's just not practical. Still useful for music albums and DVD movies I guess, but as the parent post pointed out nobody carries alt.binaries anymore. The pirates have long since moved on.
There are plenty of full-size games and UHD movies being distributed over alt.binaries. Pirates pay to use newsservers that carry the massive alt.binaries.
And at Belgacom Skynet we had people dedicated to the task of finding the illegal photos and purging them from our systems. I sat next to Thierry who was doing a lot of that work. Poor guy.
I caught only glimpses of some of the stuff he had to witness, and I would not wish that job on my worst enemy.
Yes. Many groups are pretty much dead, but there are some that are active (a handful that are QUITE active). The quality of the active groups ranges from "60% flames" to "these are Ph. D's talking to each other about things I will never understand". Though most, of course, are somewhere in-between.
alt.pub.coffeehouse.amethyst (This is somewhat low-traffic but is unique; people write in the third person imagining themselves stepping into a friendly coffeehouse)
Surprised to see alt.arts.poetry.comments on this list. Yes it remains active, but the regular posters there[1] are for the most part the remnants who triggered the Great Poet Flight to various online (moderated) forum venues 20 years ago.
Some of those troll fights were fun. Some even involved poetry.
Live: rec.arts.sf.written -- discussion of written science fiction and fantasy
Nearly dead, but if you post cogently, someone will respond: rec.audio.high-end -- discussion of high-quality (not necessarily high cost) audio reproduction
I follow comp.os.vms
and sci.electronics.design is always hot. I think there's probably a lot of little corners of usenet which are still pretty active. I was sad to see comp.dsp die off, but it's been equally more active by the same people on stackexchange.
You may be interested to note that NNCP integrated Yggdrasil support recently (though you can also run Yggdrasil at the OS level). Yggdrasil is an always-encrypted IPv6-based mesh, and is a perfect fit for something like ad-hoc wifi (since the nodes can discover a route to each other based even on RF paths).
Yggdrasil can also run as an overlay network atop standard Internet (IPv4 or IPv6), or both. It will opportunistically find peers on a local broadcast domain and find routes to other networks over the standard Internet if need be.
Feel free to drop me a note if you like; I had a very similar experience with SSB. NNCP, while it has a bit of a learning curve, Just Works. It processes thousands of packets for me every day (hourly ZFS snapshot backups for every filesystem I have), some of which are huge, and it Just Works.
I'm the guy that wrote the blog article that got posted here. So, I'm dusting off my really old HN account, to step up and say that I am very sorry it felt depressing to you, because that was not my intent.
In fact, as I said in the post, I use Matrix, I love Matrix, I evangelize Matrix (especially to Discord people), it has made a lot of strides lately. I had a previous post on distributed offline-capable IMs at https://changelog.complete.org/archives/10205-roundup-of-sec... and I got so much feedback to "don't let people use Signal, switch to Matrix!" that I specifically was addressing Matrix as a Signal replacement in the post. (I regret it wasn't super clear that's what I was doing.)
I'm going to address your points in a sort of different order, starting with:
#5, encryption. The benefit to Signal here is that encryption is NOT optional. A user just knows everything is going to be encrypted. 1-to-1 chatting, group chats ("rooms" to Matrix), voice and video calling, attachments, EVERYTHING is E2E encryption and user error can't result in things being sent in plaintext.
Now as you say there are reasons that, say, #fx-desktop-community:mozilla.org with its 1100 users shouldn't be using E2EE. However, when talking about Matrix *as a Signal replacement*, the fact that E2E is only default but not mandatory for 1-to-1 chats, and optional but not default for multi-user chats (in Element), this makes it a lot easier for non-tech-savvy end users to goof and send messages in plaintext. A secure replacement for Signal needs to not have that option. Perhaps a "secure everything" mode in Element would help.
2. Fundamentally, there is a deeper issue here: for every Matrix user, there exists at least one, and possibly more, single points of failure. As far as I know, Synapse itself isn't clusterable, so for every Matrix homeserver, the failure of, say, a single CPU will render everyone on that server unable to communicate. I say "possibly more" because many people probably will run a singleton PostgreSQL instance also, though PostgreSQL can be clustered. Or even an upgrade to Synapse there would take people offline, etc.
For me to be able to recommend an IM to people, it must pass the "I can rely on this thing to get help if my car breaks down at night" test. Right now, Matrix doesn't give me that level of comfort. Yes, it's getting better. Yes, various hosting options exist. But still, if the homeserver you're using has a bad CPU or Synapse OOMs it or whatever, your messages aren't going through in a timely manner.
3. I am glad to hear that voice and video calling are getting so close. However, I want to still add that having two different VOIP systems -- one that can handle precisely 2 participants and another that can handle more -- is jarring for end users and admins alike. People are used to being able to tap "add participant" to their calls and this is a UX issue for people coming from other IM systems.
1. I'm glad to hear these RAM issues are getting better. I've spent a fair bit of time tuning that cache parameter, from its default of 0.5 down to 0.2 (which resulted in drastically unacceptable performance) up to the other recommendation of 2.0 (which still resulted in OOMs). I am in some large Debian, Firefox, and Matrix rooms, with over a thousand participants each -- though some of those, at least, are gated from IRC where such a scale is a non-issue.
I've been following Dendrite's "are we Synapse yet?" page with interest and excitement. I am looking forward to it being ready to use! But as I stated in my post, and as you are surely aware, it's not there yet, at least based on the "are we Synapse yet?" page.
4. It's not actually that simple. A person is most likely going to want at LEAST Synapse and Element Web. Most are probably also going to need coturn, Dimension, Jitsi, synapse-admin, and maybe an identity/directory server. The downloading of the software is the easy bit. The hard bit is getting all the bits talking to each other properly, with various JSON config files, keys, DNS entries, SSL certs, well-known files, ports, etc.
I set up my own Matrix server due to difficulties with the integrations at t2bot, some limitations in the IRC bridge I had to work around, etc.
Also to those wondering why Matrix and not XMPP: I used to run ejabberd and an XMPP service. XMPP has (or at least, HAD) a real issue when being used with multiple clients - delivering messages to the wrong place, not syncing history, etc. Matrix is far better with those things. Also Jingle in XMPP land barely ever worked, last I checked.
An aside: I try not to comment on non-federated corporate-control sites (of which HN is an example), but hopefully if you reply I'll get an email or something. You are also welcome to engage me on my blog or on Mastodon, where I first surfaced many of these ideas (and did tag the Matrix Mastodon account). Or email me.
Once again, thanks for what you do. Matrix is great for many use cases and will be great for more in the future. But I want to be clear-eyed about how it compares to Signal for the secure IM use case, today.
As to why - sitting in front of emacs with a clicky model M keyboard produces a very different frame of mind. I am more focused and more deliberate in what I type (one doesn't just type ls /usr/bin on such a thing). Although it's by no means my primary computing device, I do find myself going down there for at least a little while on most days. It is a pleasant break, a change of scenery, a different mental state.
I got it, and my vt420 and vt510, after thinking about the bifurcated nature of computing history. Although I started with computers in the 80s, it was the PC side of things. The Unix/"big iron" simply wasn't accessible to many in those days. I have spent decades doing work day in, day out in what amounts to a fancy vt510 emulator (xterm). I wanted to use the real thing. Also it got my son to play zork with me.
I have a vt420, vt510, and IBM3151 and not one of them do RTS/CTS like we'd expect. The vt510 can apparently do that on the DTR/DSR pins, but the vt420 and below cannot, and neither can the 3151.
Translation: "Linux is eating our lunch. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Linux has already thoroughly trounced Windows in mobile (Android). It's done so in the web space. MS still has a strong foothold in enterprise, but it doesn't take a genius to see Linux continuing to expand on at least the backend in enterprise as well.
With more apps being delivered over the web, and web browsers being cross-platform, the desktop choice becomes less OS-centric for rote workers.
I can see this as Microsoft looking into a future where they lose relevance because of ChromeOS eating up the low end and MacOS eating up the high end, and they're left with institutional traction. Which they can coast on for many years, but not forever.
The tl;dr version is I agree with you about some of the things you mention, but also feel like there's an element of personal preference for web-based tools showing through.
I have since added additional mirrors which have everything you're looking for.