Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jessmartin's commentslogin

Has anyone put together a comparison table for Desktop apps?

I’ve started using conductor.build and it feels nice, but would happily evaluate others.


Relay user here! It’s great. Quite reliable for an early product.


Thanks for the kind words


One of the authors of the Landscape here. Glad you found it helpful!


Could be the prompt and/or tool descriptions in whatever tool you are using Claude in that degraded. Have definitely noticed variance across Cursor, Claude Code, etc even with the exact same models.

Prompts + tools matter.


Cursor became awful over the last few weeks so it's likely them, no idea what they did to their prompt but its just been incredibly poor at most tasks regardless of which model you pick.


curious: did you literally use the Local-first Landscape[1] to do the evaluation? (full disclosure: co-author of landscape)

[1] https://localfirst.fm/landscape


Yes already did through most of them. Either we have libraries around CRDTs or we have full BaaS (think Parse if anyone remembers or Firebase) soft of things that possibly can be self deployed but have a very heavy and iron clad curtain on the underlying storage medium (Postgres/SQLite) etc exposing a world view of their own.

tinyBase seems to be the only one that stands out in that regard or this LiveStore now.

PS: Thank you for putting this landscape. That really has enabled me or anyone else to look at what options are there. No amount of googling would do that kind of compilation. I find it very useful.


Just saw the talk on it at Local-first Conf. So many snyc engines these days. LiveStore is exploring an interesting space in the idea maze: marrying event sourcing with sync engines.

I couldn't believe how robust LiveStore is already. I've been trying it out for a new project over the last few weeks and it's so smooth.


How is the conf going? Would have loved to attend but couldn't quite swing it. Can't wait for the videos to drop.


Thank you! So glad you like it!


This seems like a good flow! I end up adding a "spec" and "todo" file for each feature[1]. This allows me to flesh out some of the architectural/technical decisions in advance and keep the LLM on the rails when the context gets very long.

[1] https://notes.jessmart.in/My+Writings/Pair+Programming+with+...


Yeah, I limit context by regularly trimming the TODOs. I like having 5-6 in one file because it sometimes informs the LLM as to how to complete the first in a way that makes sense for the follow-ups.

READMEs per module also help, but it really depends a lot on the model. Gemini will happily traipse all over your codebase at random, gpt-4.1 will do inline imports inside functions because it seems to lack any sort of situational awareness, Claude so far gets things mostly right.


It's so good!


Not only can you get reverse chronological feed, you can build your own feed with custom logic with a few clicks and share it with other people!

https://docs.bsky.app/blog/feature-skyfeed#what-is-skyfeed


Awesome!


Highly recommend the starter packs for finding people!


Starter packs are such a cool and obvious idea for onboarding new users. Probably won't be long before the other sites introduce something similar.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: