Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jedediah's comments login

iTerm's ability to make "non-lion" fullscreen windows is worth a tremendous amount to me.


Agreed! This is a killer feature for me. Would love to be able to disable Lion-style fullscreen across the board....


For a far more extensive list, see http://www.aboutus.org/Apple.com#redirectory-


Portland, OR

Looking for a Ruby on Rails developer at AboutUs.org

http://www.aboutus.org/AboutUs.org/Jobs


I'm jedediah on KGS, and would welcome any game, though I'm a meager ~20k, as I've just started playing.


I love this, thanks! I do miss the epub version that was available with issue #1. I'm happy to even pay for it.


Draw a mockup on paper and figure out how you want your app to work. Once it's done, get the simplest case working in real software.

I find that by getting something simple working helps me keep motivation whilst going forward, even if the code is crappy. Conversely, I've started a non-trivial number of webapps by designing a DB schema and an application architecture, each of which left me burnt out before anything of value was even written.


What advantage does this give over the built in integration tests?


Webrat and/or Capybara. Other than that, it is pretty much rspec on top of integration tests.


It also gives you the nice syntax "keywords", feature, background, and scenario.


Terrible submodule support.


Loved it when I tried it this morning, but the [apparent] overload of the servers led to my team dismissing it without a second thought.


Interesting how the reason that this bug is affecting the original poster is that a new version of the language is being used. The code can't be changed because "We have number_format in literally thousands of places across 50 or 60 separate products. Each of those changes will have to be coded, tested, written-off, released, tested by the clients since this is tax data and has to be precise for tax planning and retirement planning."

It seems to me that the entire process of testing and writing off is just as important when changing the target platform as it is when changing some of the API calls.


Agreed. When we update our platform, the entire product goes through regression tests (not necessarily a full re-run of every test, though). If we change any code to accommodate the new version, those modules are completely re-tested.

If they write tax software and don't do any formal testing, I'd seriously hesitate to use their product.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: