Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | janwillemb's comments login

Creating a note taking, personal productivity app is an elaborate but common procrastination technique for developers.


After forcing myself to learn and adapt to some note-taking system, I too didn't find it useful for me yet. But i keep pushing myself through because I still believe that there must be some value that I could take from taking notes. Just I didn't find a system that suits me well...? One thing that i find the real benefit/value from all this learn and adapt is "writing as a way to think" (is it by feynmann?). When doing complicated work, writing really help to ease your cognitive load and help you find the gaps in your line of thought. But, I couldn't find a suitable method when dealing with general/every day note-taking. I still have that "graveyard for thought" problem when writing general notes


right up there with creating your own personal website


At least you didn't create a new language for your Personal Home Page and even later rewrote it to be some sort of general hypertext processor.


I feel exposed lol


The source article[1] suggests that (in my own words) it may have to do with several kins that were brought together and tried to seal their bond by assembling a fictive individual from several deceased relatives. Or that an original important burial site was disturbed and they tried to restore the body.

[1] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/as...


Also, use two routers in serial. One is provided by my isp, the other is my own. The chances of both getting compromised at the same time are lower.


For peak security, unplug one of them.


The AI looks at the video to get clues on what to talk about. I have books behind me, it asked about my books.


Here you go. The ai seems to avoid the term "autism"? Probably configured that way.

https://suno.com/song/9b69cf3a-dbf7-4642-a229-3fa1bcc43e11


I was thinking of "The Internet Is For Porn", lol.

"Every sickness is cured in mice / every illness is cured in mice / we can treat it for a price in mice, mice, mice!"


Looks nice! Maybe add some explanation about licensing on the first pages.

And the name sounds like "butty" in Dutch, so that will be hard for me to recommend out loud for my Dutch IT students.


That's nothing. In certain English accents pronouncing "konty" is likely to cause even bigger, er, headaches than an innocent reference to a butty.


Sadly I came here to say this


I keep picturing my mate from Rotherham saying it... :D


Coq apparently renamed since professors have to introduce it to 18 year olds each year.


Incidentally, my Windows installations never self destruct, and I have used the product on several versions in the last 25+ years (since W95). My Linux installations however have, for example by standard updates.


Parent did not say it was challenging.

I find fiddling with LE tedious because it has to be repeated too often.


certbot and crontab needs to be setup just once, to solve cert problem


HTTPS when used in the ubiquitous manner it is now always strikes me as unnecessary complexity and tedium, and reasonings like yours addressing them with even more complexity and tedium.

Whatever happened to KISS?


It happened that the last S changed from "stupid" to "secure". If I use HTTPS I can safely enough connect to my home services through an open cafe Wifi, for example


I’ve been using caddy for a year which does everything for you. Basically nginx/haproxy but with https built-in via LE, no fiddling about with cert files and brittle LE scripts, also supports subdomains equally easily.


It even survives the HN hug of death. Very disappointing.


How bad is the HN hug of death btw? My laptop can serve 200k QPS per core. I can't imagine HN is that much more intensive? Are 1vCPU VMs just that much worse?


Yes, they are much worse than bon-fide actual single cores on most recently purchased laptops. But also, the HN hug of death mostly happens with tiny non-static sites that are sloppily hosted. If you're serving static assets it's hard to "hug of death" a Casio watch.


The thing that gets saturated first for most at-home or cheap-VPS hosting is the low-throughput network uplink.


Can you serve 200GB of an average 1mb large HTML page per second too, per core?


No, definitely not.


Your laptop can serve 200k qps per core?


To be fair, most modern computers can, but yes.


Holy crap what kind of laptop are you running?


M3 at work, Acer Swift 3 at home. Both are comparable in that regard. You can do 200k QPS of actual work (a little protobuf parsing, a little old-school ML, handling the networking, a little HTTP1.1 parsing, ...), more if you just want vanity metrics, just by wrapping something like uSockets [0] and not doing anything to explicitly pessimize the system.

You can do better with a hand-crafted solution, but most projects don't need anything fancier.

[0] https://github.com/uNetworking/uSockets


Context is a website, so HTTPS requests per second would be the relevant metric.


I'm also quoting HTTPS requests per second.


Free identity theft included!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: