[5] Yelimeli, Supriya (February 24, 2021). "Berkeley denounces racist history of single-family zoning, begins 2-year process to change general plan - Council unanimously approved a resolution that will work toward banning single-family zoning". Berkeleyside.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210301140957/https://www.berke...
Accurate or not, I hate that all of these references are from one 6-month regional news cycle. They may as well be 1 citation, rather than 5. The excess just makes the inclusion of claim look more motivated by political investment than a desire to be informative.
I hate that people's instinct is to play 4D chess with the intent of some random Wiki editor instead of even glancing at the data contained in the references. Here are some aged references for your discerning palate:
This disputes the claim it originated in SF and the reasons listed. Odd that Wikipedia is centered on SF and its claim is backed up by (several experts believe.) Looks to me like another example of Wikipedia pushing a narrative and pretending it’s fact.
Looks to me like another example of HN guy pushing a narrative and pretending it’s fact. Or maybe someone just made a mistake and a more charitable reading would show that there is perhaps not a conspiracy going on but instead just a misunderstanding.
It would be illegal specifically if you _collected and stored_ the IP address information from the phone home requests to process in some form later.
If you simply process the web request, and don't store the IP address then there it no issue.
If you do end up storing IP address in a log somewhere, then simply having the logs deleted in a documented and reasonable timeframe will be enough.
"Documented and reasonable timeframe" is intentionally vague since business requirements are varied, but if you can justify whatever you come up with, then there is no issue.
Simply do not hold onto user data for longer that what is required for the purposes of the user request. That's it.
Yeah, the ruby community has a bit of an axe to grind with SPAs. Opinions range from the defensible ("JS is a bit overused, sometimes pure serverside rendering like Rails does is all you need") to the imo-ridiculous ("Pretty much no one needs an SPA and the whole frontend JS world is a passing fad").
I think this is less about the casualties of war itself, but the effects of when trying to move on after the war.
If people die due to landmines many years after a ceasefire are they a casualty of the war?
I think landmines represent a physical device that artifically extends the destruction of war in a time that is way after the parties may have agreed to peace. In that sense, the landmine inflicts death on people with no agency. A bomb dropped on a someone has intent and an army responsible for it. A landmine planted decades ago is so divorced from its original intent that any resulting death or injury feels random and injust.
Russia still has periodic fertility gaps from WW2. In Paraguay blond, blue eyed, natives who only speak Guarani are witnesses of the Triple Alliance's widespread rape (150 years ago?). Europe is littered with unexploded ordinance
A landmime is not a pleasant thing to leave behind. But if deployed strategically (not scattered everywhere as a terror weapon), and if it can avoid a war its not obvious to me that the generational effects aren't the least evil.
Imagine, during a war, a missile that has been set to target a city.
The casualties will be many, and random, and innocent, but this is wartime and horrible things happen.
Now, imagine that this missile is set to target the city, but will launch at a random time in the future. The missile may launch during the war, or many years after.
Now it's obvious to me that the missile that lauches at the random point in the future is more evil than the one fired immediately.
It's a poor analogy, but the random missile is how I view landmines.
Targeting cities is already a war crime regardless the weapon.
Nor am I arguing that laying landmines everywhere is not immoral. Certainly not landmines in a city.
Im arguing that a concentrated land mine field across a small strategic piece of land (say a mountain passage, the DMZ) can be militarily effective and therefore help avoid war.
Does this then change the moral calculus of land mines?
Ben Eater has one of the best channels on YouTube! If you haven’t already, check out his 8 bit bread board computer series. He explains how to make a computer, completely from scratch. Coming from the software world, I found this to be absolutely fascinating!
Does anyone know if the Framework team plan to offer an ARM based mainboard?
I'm honestly not even sure that there are any good ARM based SoCs to make a laptop mainboard from, but given what we've seen from Apple's development of their iPhone chips being integrated into laptop and desktop, I wonder if something similar could be done with other existing ARM CPUs from Samsung or Nvidia?
The mt8192 is faster than the rk3588 and already shipping in Chromebooks. Plenty of activity on the linux-mediatek mailing list to mainline support for the currently shipping Chromebooks.
mt8195 Chromebooks should appear soon too, and they are even faster than the mt8192. Mainlining activity is also occurring for this SoC.
It's the first sentence in the History section