I don't know if it's the same Ken Johnson, but I found a video about AppSec with a Ken Johnson that had his twitter profile in the description https://x.com/cktricky. Then I found this Ken Johnson LinkedIn page, and there's no mention of working at Microsoft, so it's probably not the same guy, and this other Ken Johnson looks much younger than I was expecting.

> 1. World of Warcraft in 2004 is very different from World of Warcraft in 2024. Do future versions "destroy" previous ones? How do you deal with this?

I think it's more about the right of the consumer to be able to play what they paid for than keep the original version intact.

The right to play World of Warcraft by yourself is worthless. The content available to a single player isn't even supposed to be fun.

You'd need the right to run a full server that your friends can also connect to.

> mind flayer, illithid

If I understand correctly, they only own copyrights for the lore, not the names and appearance. Also product identity so they can't be used by other tabletops, but other media can use them. For example, the game Demon's Souls have Mind Flayers, they are called Mind Flayers and look the part. I doubt From Soft and/or Sony are paying royalties for such minor enemy.

I think this case is different from the Beholder which seemingly they own complete rights since they made Tibia change their Beholder to something distinct.

> For example, the game Demon's Souls have Mind Flayers, they are called Mind Flayers and look the part. I doubt From Soft and/or Sony are paying royalties for such minor enemy.

Do they behave like mind flayers? Mind flayers have always been known for their ability to instantly kill a player by using a special attack that extracts his brain; that kind of prevents them from being "minor enemies".

They have an attack which stuns the player, followed up by a grab attack which looks a lot like them trying to bite(?) your head across a few seconds, doing immense damage.

I think it's probably intended to be that, yes.

I haven’t played demon souls but if they’re like the other mindflayer equivalents that fromsoft has made for their other games (the lanterns from bloodborne come to mind or the Elden ring dlc insta kill madness guys) they absolutely do instantly kill players with some mind based shenanigans.

They stun, then skitter over and do a grab attack that sucks your brains, usually a one-hit kill as you encounter them early enough.

The games embark has released are made in Unreal Engine, maybe the game using rust hasn't been released yet.

I use mostly to follow indie game devs, to follow their progress and not miss announcements of release dates, and also a few artists.

I can see the use to describe AI spam, but I am starting to seeing people using it to describe anything they don't like, basically a replacement for "mid" with was highly used the last couple of years. I noticed that when some people learn a new "trendy" word, they want to use it in every possible opportunity until it loses meaning.

"Slop" is a internet slang that has always been used to refer to low quality content that exploits current internet trends, using it to refer specifically to AI generated content is pretty new.

> basically a replacement for "mid" with was highly used the last couple of years

Wot now? Somehow I managed to completely miss that.

Edit: ah, seems like it's mainly a twitter thing. That explains it.

"mid" is something I hear from people high school age most commonly.

I've seen it on reddit too.

Of course, it's seeking it's low energy state.

I was thinking, maybe games were more immersive with lower fidelity because it left something for our imagination to do. And that made us more engaged.

"a large boulder the size of a small boulder"

> The mystical two-headed dog… born with only one head!

"Drink the verification can" is more relevant than ever.

Based on your excruciatingly detailed activity for the last 3 months, you haven't been buying any cans. Yet you've been passing the drink verification test.

Your account is suspended until you provide proof of purchase or pay full retail price for 90 cans, plus 200% surcharge.